Skip to Content

AOL Tech

Recent Comments:

Verizon confirms DROID tethering cost, will ask subscribers to double-down on their data plan {Engadget Mobile}

Nov 6th 2009 7:51PM I just read Doug's comment below. I totally forgot you can't use voice and data at the same time on Verizon. This is one of the reasons I left to AT&T. Although Verizon has a near perfect network, AT&T's has worked good enough for me and the ability to surf the net for info while in a phone call is a huge plus.

$90 a month just to use voice and data at the same time, while GSM competitors are only charging $60 for phone + tethering to do the same thing? Verizon is ripping you off.

Verizon confirms DROID tethering cost, will ask subscribers to double-down on their data plan {Engadget Mobile}

Nov 6th 2009 7:46PM Dump the data card, sign up for tethering with your phone and save yourself $30 a month.

Verizon looking to bump early termination fee to $350 on 'advanced' devices {Engadget Mobile}

Nov 4th 2009 2:04PM Just pray to the free-market god, I'm sure that it will prevent all the carriers from doing the exact same thing so you have a choice of different levels of ETFs.

Paramount and Kingston team up for movies on flash memory {Engadget}

Nov 2nd 2009 8:29PM As mechachu said:
"And since when are flash drives limited to 4 gb?"

You can get up to 128GB on a thumb drive from Fry's. For thumb drives, the issue isn't size/space, it's cost. An 8GB thumb drive costs $15. I'm sure that the cost for them to make a DVD is a lot cheaper than that, probably a few cents. They need to bring the $/GB price down for thumb drives to make them a practical competitor to DVDs.

GSM DROID with multitouch pinch-to-zoom demoed on video hating America {Engadget Mobile}

Nov 2nd 2009 6:27PM Double tapping is much more hit or miss because, with any website fullscreen, a user's finger is so big that homing in on very small links becomes difficult without zooming. If the link is all by itself in a decently large enough table cell, 80% of the time I can hit the link without zooming, 90% of the time I can double tap to zoom and then click the link, but there's still that 10% of the time where no matter how precise I try to tap I'm sent to the wrong area of the page or just can't hit the link. I could double tap elsewhere and drag over to the location I need, but that doesn't always help because I still do not have precise control over the zoom level and there have been times when I've need to be insanely close to a link to click it.

Multi-touch gives the most precise control over zoom I've experienced over all of the phones I've tried. For me, that is the most intuitive way to navigate a webpage. It's like holding the page physically in my hand and performing some movement in concert to get a better view, such as bring the page closer or further to my face while moving it left, right, up or down at the same time.

I'm willing to agree that multi-touch is useless when it comes to one handed use. I have been able to do one-handed multi-touch gestures before, but it's tricky enough that I wouldn't call it practical. I'm willing to agree that for a majority of tasks, multi-touch is unnecessary because of features like tap-to-zoom. But, there are a few times where multi-touch has been a more intuitive way to navigate applications, that without it I would feel that the UI was a bit clunky, and with it I feel like the interface is much closer to 100% intuitive usability.

For casual use, I don't usually make much use of multi-touch, but when I'm in a heated web-surfing session on my phone, I make abundant use of multi-touch for one of the smoothest and most intuitive web browsing experiences I've experienced on any phone.

Now if only Apple would stop requiring me to jailbreak to get features like background apps, I would probably continue to be an iPhone consumer. Lacking that, I may just make the hop over to a phone like Droid, as long as it has an UI experience on par with the iPhone, and that includes multi-touch.

The game has changed {Engadget Mobile}

Oct 28th 2009 8:58PM Nor is Google using tactics like threatening handset manuf. to only carry their apps.
Nor does Google brainwash their employees to hate unions, of course Google doesn't need to because their employees don't want to unionize because Google doesn't pay them crap wages with no benefits.

Verizon chief says offering the iPhone is Apple's call {Engadget Mobile}

Oct 26th 2009 5:02PM The iPhone is helping AT&T and hurting Verizon:
"The New York telecommunications company has done an admirable job of keeping pace with AT&T, which has an exclusive deal to sell the iPhone, but finally faltered amid record sales of the Apple device, as well as heightened competitive pressure on the low end. The number of new contract customers fell more than 50% from a year earlier, largely because Verizon lacked any new high-profile devices in the period."
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704335904574496954080545902.html

As long as AT&T doesn't let its network go completely to pot, this will continue to be a huge advantage to them. Verizon can have a gold plated network, but as long as AT&T's network is good enough for their users, the fact that they continue to be the only carrier to have the iPhone will be the deciding factor.

I switched from Verizon to AT&T a year ago for the iPhone and have been very satisfied with it. If Verizon would carry a phone that I like as much as the iPhone, then I would consider switching again. Alas, the lack of multi-touch from their phones is a deal-breaker for me. It's also nice to be able to use voice and data at the same time, but maybe LTE will change that for Verizon.

Profile

  • bernardino
  • Member Since Sep 28th, 2007

Are you bernardino? If So, Login Here.

Activity

Engadget
124 Comments
Engadget HD
1 Comment
Engadget Mobile
169 Comments

AOL News