It's here, folks. The
, and now that we've had a few days to mess around with it, we're able to tell you how we truly and deeply feel. There have been
circulating for the past few months, but now that it's finally legit we can give this sexy piece of tech a proper shakedown. It's been roughly described as a CDMA
No matter what you call it -- Niagara, Tour, 9630 -- there's no denying that this is the BlackBerry that CDMA users have been waiting for and lusting over. Ever since the
very first whispers and
early photos emerged, the main question on everyone's mind has been a frantic "When?!" Now that it's finally set to hit the market next week -- on a variety of carriers no less -- we can really dig deeper and give it a thorough look.
Hardware and Design
We've got to admit that in our opinion, this is one of the most attractive BlackBerry devices ever made. Whereas the Bold can seem a tad gaudy and overdone -- what with the leather back cover and visually heavy chrome bezel -- the Tour has a more subtle dull chrome bezel and a battery cover than looks sleek and attractive. That said, this is still primarily targeted as a professional device, and it comes along not a moment too soon as a replacement to the aging
8830, which has historically been the global-ready BlackBerry of choice for CDMA customers.
We were a bit worried when we first saw the carbon fiber-esque finish on the battery cover, but it really looks great in person. We're big fans of the final finish that Verizon went with: the combination of smooth rubber and textured plastic seems to work and makes it feel virtually perfect in your hand. It adds to the professional feel of the device, and while we personally aren't rushing to swap it, we're sure that there will be a whole crop of third-party covers before you know it if the factory one isn't your cup of tea.
In terms of the keyboard, we weren't surprised to find that RIM has really hit one out of the park again. The keyboard feels spacious and comfortable, despite the fact that it has almost the same exact width as the one on the Curve 8300 series. We prefer the mushiness of the keys here over the hardness of the keyboard on the Curve; it isn't
as mushy as the one found on the Bold, but it's a happy medium between tactility and comfort. Typing out long e-mails or engaging in riveting BlackBerry Messenger conversations on this keyboard will be painless, and to us it's a step up from everything else currently available apart from perhaps the Bold, which still holds the unofficial prize for best BlackBerry keyboard ever (in our books, at least).
The Tour uses a high resolution 480 x 360 screen that really just looks stunning on the face of the device. Fonts and graphics are crisp, colors are vibrant. One minor complaint: there's a noticeable black border around the screen, and we wish that the actual screen simply stretched further across the front instead. It's by no means a deal breaker -- and it's entirely possible that there was a technical reason behind the design decision -- but it's definitely noticeable.
To make the Tour even more appealing to enterprise and business customers, Verizon is offering two versions of the Tour -- with camera and without. The review unit we secured has a 3.2 megapixel camera on the back of the device which is capable of video and photo capture. There's not else to elaborate on here; photos are perfectly decent, but you probably won't be shooting your wedding video or taking prom photos with this phone.
We're not trying to nitpick, but there are a few hardware issues that we're kind of surprised weren't hammered out before this phone went into mass production. Like on the pre-production model we'd played with before, the trackball seems excessively recessed, which makes it much more difficult to use than it needs to be. While we aren't really fond of it, some other people who played with the device seemed to like it more -- different strokes for different folks, we guess.

Also, the screen itself seems to be incredibly sensitive to pressure -- overly sensitive. Even light touches on the screen or some of the navigation keys underneath it caused weirdness with the LCD. This might be a result of the screen being flush or just not being sufficiently secured, but it's somewhat noticeable and a bit annoying. It just feels "softer" than the one on the Bold, and there's a bit more give than we believe there should be. It's too minute to properly demonstrate in a photo -- but if you go play with a unit in a store and switch from the main screen to the full splash screen with 18 icons, we're sure that you'll notice it too. We've never seen this issue with the Bold, and it raises questions about build quality on a device that business users will be counting on to be rock-solid day in and day out.
Software Software-wise, there isn't all that much new here that hasn't already been around on more recent GSM BlackBerry devices; that said, for CDMA users, it's still a big leap forward in terms of functionality and polish. We were told that the software build on our device isn't the final build, and we're glad to hear it because we had a bunch of complete freezes that required a battery pull to remedy.
We're assuming that most existing Verizon users will be upgrading from the Curve 8330 or the 8830 World Edition, so the jump to OS 4.7 will be noticeable. Generally, however, the aesthetics and theme on the Tour mirror the UI on devices like the Bold and Curve 8900 -- transparency, simple outlined icons and the like. Of course, Verizon has splashed a nice bit of red all over its customized theme, but it's nothing that can't be remedied with some third-party additions.

Die-hard BlackBerry users will be interested to hear that the Tour is packing a new build of the completely addicting BlackBerry Messenger. Sadly, it isn't the same feature-packed build that has been seen floating around with the more recent OS 5.0, but it's a step up from anything available on 4.5. It has a cleaner UI, a more extensive smiley collection, and functionality to send your location using the built-in GPS. When you send location, if the recipient is using OS 4.6 or 4.7, a preview of the map shows up; for users on older devices, a fairly useless BlackBerry Maps URL is sent instead.
Verizon is also offering its
VZ Navigator software with the Tour, which integrates with the built-in GPS chip to allow turn-by-turn navigation -- and it will support global navigation at the time of launch. As always, the service carries an extra charge which can be billed monthly or daily depending on how much you plan to use it. It works pretty much as expected -- and it's virtually the same as VZ Navigator on other devices, so we'll spare you the nitty gritty details.
We're also glad to report that the built-in GPS chip seems to be unlocked, meaning that it will work with third party apps. Verizon has gotten a lot of flack in the past about the decision to lock it down only for VZ Navigator, so we're glad to see the company following through with
its promise to start opening up.
Also bundled is the new visual voicemail app, which -- you guessed it -- is being offered for an additional fee each month. A link to the app is included as a service book, but it has to be downloaded separately for use. We don't know if this means Verizon doesn't anticipate that many users being interested or if there's some other justification, but either way it seems to get the job done -- though it probably won't shut your iPhone-toting friends up.
We didn't conduct a series of scientific tests to get rock solid numbers on battery life, but from what we can tell it seems to be pretty decent. RIM is quoting 5 hours of talk time and 14 days of standby which seems to be about right. We don't envision people having trouble getting through the day, as we were able to browse, BBM, and run our
favorite Twitter apps in the background for a solid day and a half without even getting a low battery warning. However, to be safe, you'll probably want to charge nightly -- and your own mileage may vary depending on things like Bluetooth, GPS use, and the actual amount of calling you're doing.
Wrap UpPut simply, the BlackBerry Tour is far and away the best CDMA BlackBerry available, and it could very well might be the best BlackBerry period if not for a few shortcomings. At this point in the game, we're still in denial that there isn't WiFi in this device -- it's inexcusable. We're well aware of Verizon's stance on the matter, and we still think it's ridiculous that they're allowing RIM to offer a device in this category that doesn't offer such a basic, universal feature, seemingly in an effort to increase reliance on WWAN data services and juice customers for a few extra bucks in data revenue. We're also disappointed that the screen doesn't make the most of the available real estate and that
it seems excessively sensitive. Bottom line, if you're a CDMA user and plan to keep things that way, the Tour is definitely the best BlackBerry available -- and it will probably be that way for a long time to come.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Shenanigans @ Jul 7th 2009 1:42PM
"photos are perfectly decent"
Huh?
RDM @ Jul 7th 2009 1:54PM
Cute... Now release the Onyx!
cocoviper @ Jul 7th 2009 1:59PM
Yea how about some actual images taken with said camera?
murmermer @ Jul 7th 2009 2:27PM
The photos make it look like their already is dust under the screen... looks like another case of shoddy manufacturing
D @ Jul 7th 2009 4:42PM
Um...why is there no mention of call quality in this review of a PHONE?
Does engadget not have any friends they can call???
Rollins @ Jul 7th 2009 1:43PM
Good review, though I'm sick of people blaming Verizon for RIM not putting WiFi into their CDMA BlackBerry devices. RIM hasn't put WiFi in a Sprint BB either, and plenty of smartphones (including the $50 Ozone!) on Verizon have it. It's RIM's decision, no one else's.
Jonathan @ Jul 7th 2009 1:47PM
I don't think the Ozone and Blackberry users are going to need the same priced data plan, or use the services as much as one another. That doesn't really prove anything.
Rollins @ Jul 7th 2009 1:49PM
They both require, at minimum, a $30 data plan.
Verizon would not benefit in any way, shape, or form by forcing RIM to remove WiFi. It's a myth that really needs to die.
Ricky @ Jul 7th 2009 2:08PM
It's already been noted by RIM insiders on Crackberry.com that it was at Verizon's request. RIM wouldn't release a WiFi version just for Sprint. The demo units of the Tour actually had WiFi.
Trevor @ Jul 7th 2009 3:05PM
I have to agree with Rollins, the Tour, like the Storm, supports 7 cellular bands 2 CDMA, 4 GSM, 1 UMTS (Used in Japan). At some point you kind of run out of space on the device for more wireless networks. Since this device is slated as a business class device the desire to provided complete worldwide coverage was quite crucial. More so, in RIM's opinion, than WiFi.
For me this device will bridge me for the next year until Telus has completed their migration to HSPA, once there, the need for the CDMA bands disappears and we can roll with the HSPA and WiFi goodness, yum!
Rollins @ Jul 7th 2009 3:09PM
Exactly. Unless someone provides material proof that the early Tour units had WiFi, I'm simply not buying it.
Amon @ Jul 7th 2009 3:12PM
cant see why carrier complicity (at least) isnt involved here, as you would know, a $30 data plan doesnt give unlimited (not to say faster as wifi) data!
d889 @ Jul 7th 2009 3:50PM
the thing is you really dont need wifi on this thing, if you are inside somewhere chances are there is a real computer if you have absolutely no reception.
and this thing is a PHONE, you are supposed to be able to use all of its features when you are ... maybe ... OUTSIDE?
JimboJones @ Jul 7th 2009 4:42PM
there are four (well five) reasons why people need WIFI (even business)
1. international travel - unless you want to spend $$$$$ for data roaming, WIFI is a must
2. VOIP calling is very popular these days and some other smartphones have it (mostly via WIFI only)
3. WIFI is faster than 3G no matter what you think
4. I will never open my home network just because I want to access some of my home devices from my smartphone, this is why I use WIFI
5. WPS --> WIFI is used for GPS in situations when you cannot see satellite and have wifi access points around
Vic @ Jul 7th 2009 7:00PM
1. Verizon and Sprint offers the best international data plans available, unlimited data for $64.99 and $69.99 per month, respectively. Compared to AT&T's crappy 50MB for $64.99 or T-Mobile's unlimited email (read "No web browsing/data aside from email") plans.
2. The only thing limiting VoIP over cellular networks are the developers. EVDO is more than capable of VoIP.
3. WiFi isn't necessarily faster. It's based on bandwidth, same with the carriers. There are instances where WiFi could be hooked up to a slow data network, boggled down by multiple users, or both. Along with that, unless you plan on downloading massive size files, when it comes to web browsing on the *****y BB Web Browser (sorry, I am picking up the Tour, but I know that's one of the main weaknesses with BlackBerries), you're not going to notice a difference between EVDO at 1.1Mbps or WiFi at 20Mbps. Heck, from having the Bold for some time, I barely saw a difference in performance going from EDGE to WiFi...
There main advantage of WiFi, IMO, is the ability to connect when you're in areas with weak coverage, such as being deep in a building or in a basement. I do use WiFi on my iPhone because AT&T's coverage at my house and part-time job is abysmal; however, on my Sprint Palm Treo Pro, I have never been anywhere where I needed WiFi, so I can easily sacrifice it for the Sprint BB Tour.
Trevor @ Jul 7th 2009 7:16PM
@jimbojones I would add one more to that list - 6) the "no simultaneous voice/data" limitations of CDMA 3G means that having wifi on your BB would enable you to browse the web and still get email while you're on a call.
JimboJones @ Jul 7th 2009 8:31PM
Vic,
(1) $70/month is dam lot of money for data you would not need if you need to check your email once a day over WIFI, yes it's not that much if you want to have data plan 24/7, the point is that you have no choice. Users with WIFI smartphones do.
(2) if I understand it correctly $70 does not cover any voice. WIFI is not as flexible but allows me to talk to friends over skype as much as I want for almost nothing, the roaming charges I saw on verizon web site is a joke. Does Verizon allows to you VOIP over roaming data?
(3) dude seriously, you must be joking, of course if you connect on slow wifi, you will get slow network. I've seen way too many places with dam slow 3G and wireless access available ...
(4) no response, so I guess it means that you have no workaround
(5) no response, so I guess it means that you have no workaround
(6) Trevor's good point - I've been on way too many 2 hours conference calls with my BB, I think I'm not the only one
(7) some users don't want to pay for data plan, with WIFI they can get emails at home, at school, in coffee shops
the point is that WIFI is good, it's not solution to every problem but it can solves some for free. Verizon's dumb NO-NO approach means that some users are going to pick AT&T or T-MOBILE.
Jared @ Jul 7th 2009 10:06PM
@Jimbo
your forgetting this is a VERIZON phone. That means, you MUST pay the $30 a month for unl. data... or as they call it "The smart phone plan".
The $70 a month is for the min. amount of voice minutes (Around 550 for AT&T) + unl. data + (maybe) unl. text.
Wifi would be a great feature to have, but if your already paying $30 for unlimited 3G/data, you might as well use it. The speed difference between the average wifi connection your tap into (like at say.. Taco Bell), and the speed of your 3G connections will usually fall in the barely-noticeable to unnoticeable category.
JimboJones @ Jul 7th 2009 11:23PM
well ... you MUST only if you buy the phone with discount through Verizon, because it has no WIFI, there is no point not to get data plan, you can get decent nokia phone with wifi under $300 and skip data plan (as quite a lot of people in europe do)
Terry @ Jul 8th 2009 10:53AM
You are mistaken The cell phone manufacturers are very much under the sway of the telcoms not the other way around.
manbeast @ Jul 9th 2009 4:43PM
actually this decision is made solely by verizon and sprint, rim would put wifi in all of their devices if it were up to them, its actually less cost effective for verizon and sprint to not allow it since cdma does not allow simultaneous data and voice, it was a major reason why i hesitated to switch back to verizon from AT&T but i was forced to due to a switch in careers
Frank @ Jul 27th 2009 12:24AM
I totally agree with that. Verizon is a smart company and even if you had WIFI on the phone you would still have to get a data plan. Lets be realistic to, who would even purchased a phone like this without knowing they had to get some kind of data plan??. Which incase you didnt know start as low as around $20 for limited
Andrew Lazetera @ Sep 19th 2009 1:20AM
ANYONE saying "you don't need wifi" is a complete moron. There is Z E R O coverage in my ENTIRE state. I have 6KB/s internet speed over my *required* $60/mo data plan. Explain to me why I do not need WiFi.
This is the same issue I have with those assholes who think all vehicles should be small, FWD, and get 60MPG. My wonderful state also requires full-time all wheel drive to get out of your DRIVEWAY 7 months out of the year, and that's if you live in the CITY.
So yeah, there are people in other parts of the world other than your back yard that get shafted on data plans and get Z E R O data coverage. I switched to AT&T in January, when they said they would be rolling out 3G coverage across the state by the end of the year. I literally laughed in the salesperson's face, and when they asked why I laughed, I asked if they were willing to sign their name to that and personally pay me a refund of the data plan if there was not 3G coverage anywhere in the state. To date there is not one single 3G tower in my state, and the first one they are still trying to put up will be 100+ miles away from me (even in other states).
But I don't need WiFi in a phone, no, I like 6KB/s when my laptop is tethered... Especially when I am paying $10 more for effectively crappy dialup than I am for the business class Comcast 6Mb/1Mb connection I have to my house...
Jesse Wagner @ Sep 19th 2009 3:49PM
Why are you buying a phone with "Z E R O coverage in my ENTIRE state"?
Dorf @ Jul 7th 2009 1:44PM
Great review, except for the WiFi part? What exactly is Verizon's stance on WiFi? Just about all the WinMo phones have it. No CDMA carrier has a Blackberry with WiFi, so why does VZW always take the blame for it?
Jonathan @ Jul 7th 2009 1:47PM
"Just about all the WinMo phones have it."
Ok, then THIS proves it!
Jacob Schulman @ Jul 7th 2009 1:52PM
@Dorf: Historically, Verizon has been MAJORLY anti-WiFi in the devices it chooses to bring to market. From a technical standpoint, there's virtually no reason that there isn't WiFi in the Tour. We obviously can't be 100% sure, but it was probably proposed by RIM and then promptly shut down by Big Red before it could ever get into mass production.
That said, this hardware is already pretty old. I know that the hardware has been finalized for at LEAST 2 months, and it's really been a software game after that.
Dorf @ Jul 7th 2009 1:56PM
You say they are anti-WiFi, but I just don't see the proof. If it is so easy for RIM to produce a CDMA 'berry with WiFi, why has Sprint, or Altell, or US Cell or the Canadian carriers every offered one? Anybody have an answer? Do you think Verizon is involved in some conspiracy to prevent other CDMA carriers to offer a WiFi CDMA 'berry? Really?
The One @ Jul 7th 2009 2:35PM
What you've said is spot on. VZW requires a data plan on all smartphones and blackberries anyway, regardless of wifi or not, plus winmo devices for VZW have wifi, and still require the data plan, and no other CDMA carrier has a cdma blackberry with wifi, yet, they have windows mobile devices with wifi. So, although some people like to say, VZW doesn't want wifi, or they are doing it for greed, obviously, that is not true, or we'd see at least one CDMA blackberry for at least one of the other cdma carriers with wifi and if VZW was blocking it out of greed, they wouldn't allow wifi on their windows mobile devices.
cocoviper @ Jul 7th 2009 2:02PM
It's highly likely that since Verizon is by far the only CDMA carrier with the scale to drive a new device that if they don't want it, Sprint or Alltel certainly aren't going to get it. Otherwise RIM would be making a device that would sell maybe 1-2M?
Anton Wahlman @ Jul 7th 2009 2:17PM
Here is how it works: Verizon is by far and away the largest CDMA network. They have told RIM that they don't want WiFi in their Blackberries. For whichever reason, RIM bends to this demand. Then Sprint and other smaller CDMA operators ride this decision, because they would be faced with delays and higher prices (lower-volume) if they specify a separate piece of hardware. Here is the good news: It has been suggested by credible sources that the 9630/Tour is the last Blackberry where Verizon has pushed for the lack of WiFi. Allegedly, going forward, other post-9630/Tour devices will have WiFi. Finally, reason will have prevailed -- many years too late.
Microsoft Windows devices have WiFi because their manufacturers aren't as tight with Verizon and simply go ahead and develop their devices, and present them to Verizon and say "Hey, here is a device for you. Do you want it?" At that point, Verizon has said yes in some instances. But ask yourself: How many Blackberries does Verizon sell vs how many Microsoft Windows devices? How many marketing dollars does Verizon put behind Blackberry vs how Microsoft Windows? RIM simply caters to the carrier's preferences all the way, from day 1, thus this result to date.
Rollins @ Jul 7th 2009 2:22PM
But -why- would Verizon not want RIM to put in WiFi? There's no reason for it. It doesn't benefit Verizon in any way; hell, having some users utilize WiFi would actually lessen the strain on their data network.
I'm not going to believe some unnamed RIM insiders on Crackberry just because they claim demo units had WiFi. Show me.
Anton Wahlman @ Jul 7th 2009 2:36PM
So to the question of WHY Verizon doesn't want WiFi, the answer is irrational in most ways. Verizon has a religious aversion to unlicensed frequencies, i.e., those frequencies that it doesn't own/license. Those frequencies (WiFi) aren't manageable by a carrier such as Verizon, and therefore it believes that it shouldn't operate in that "gutter." I know, it's an insane view, but it's been the prevailing one at Verizon for years. One additional (and in its own way, rational) reason has been handset battery life. Verizon believes that it doesn't want to burden its users with a lower performance. Again, the good news is that Verizon is alleged to be dropping this religion starting with devices to be launched in a few months down the road.
Dorf @ Jul 7th 2009 2:41PM
@Anton Wahlman
I'm just not buying that argument. Most of the WinMo device Verizon have are only on Verizon. Are you telling me Samsung created a Saga for Verizon with WiFi without asking Verizon if they were ok with it? That makes no sense.
They are not going to waste time developing a device, then present it to Verizon. They work together on that stuff.
That will change with LTE.. I'll just go buy some unlocked LTE device and pop a Verizon SIM in it eventually. Man that will be sweet.
Anton Wahlman @ Jul 7th 2009 2:57PM
As far as Samsung WinMo is concerned, I'll quote President J.F. Kennedy from October 1962: "We were eyeball to eyeball, and I think the other guy just blinked." Yes, in that case Samsung just pressed its case, regardless of where/when it took place in the process, and Verizon yielded. If Verizon hadn't blinked, Samsung would have been screwed. RIM, in contrast, simply doesn't engage in a conflict with a carrier to begin with.
Rollins @ Jul 7th 2009 3:08PM
@Anton Wahlman
What about HTC?
It just doesn't make sense. Verizon clearly has no issue with WiFi; if they did, there wouldn't be five different devices (over half of their Windows Mobile lineup) with it.
The only explanation I can think of that makes any sense whatsoever is that Verizon wants to push WiFi as an exclusive feature of their Windows Mobile phones so they can actually sell some of them. That theory has its own issues, though.
Anton Wahlman @ Jul 7th 2009 3:40PM
Yes, same thing with HTC as with Samsung. Same "Verizon blinked first" explanation there. RIM simply sits on the carrier's inside and bends to its every whim. Fortunately, it appears Verizon may have realized its mistake, and late 2009 or at least 2010 will see all new Verizon Blackberries include WiFi. That, in combination with the advent of LTE voice-capable handsets in June-July 2011, will bring Verizon into the global technology mainstream.
el Capitan @ Jul 7th 2009 3:55PM
@Dorf
Like the avatar, hate the vibe it brings...you're apparently a Verizon fanboy. Didnt know that such ppl would exist!
I'd just like to mention one more Wifi advantage that hasn't been picked up yet. UMA. I travel alot abroad (which is why we dropped VZW - useless), and as long as there is a wireless rounter in range, I have my own little (free) femtocell, thus full reception with lighting fast internet and, best of all, I am always able to call the US for free (on minutes).
THAT is frikkin' awesome!
Doax @ Jul 7th 2009 7:18PM
I don't know that I buy that Verizon is the only CDMA carrier big enough for them to bother to make a wifi capable CDMA BB. Cus SprintNextel is the largest iden carrier in the states and the 8350i has wifi. It was late to the 8300 series party but it still arrived. Seems to me that it would be in Rims court that they are choosing not to include that hardware in their devices. And lets say it is due to Verizons bullying that RIM didn't include wifi to make people more dependent on their data plans. Holy craps there's an issue here of anti-competitiveness, well more like their clout having a negative impact on the consumer and the industry. ramble..ramble..ramble..
Dorf @ Jul 7th 2009 11:07PM
@el Capitan
Not really a VZW fanboy. I guess you could call me a VZW network fanboy. Have to drive a few hours to get a sniff of AT&T 3G and that only came about in the last few months. Kinda like the first car you buy.. you have an attachment to it.
I don't see why you would drop Verizon because of international travel. Their voice rates are identical to AT&T's. VZW also has the superior data plan. If you are overseas for a month, a week or even a day you just call VZW, move your data plan to the unlimited global plan ($64.99) and when you get back, you move it back. They charge you for the time you have it, so if you have it for 1 day out of 30, you pay 1/30th of that $64.99. Doesn't AT&T force you to keep the plan for the entire month?
The only downside is device choice for International users. You are very limited currently with VZW. 8830, Saga, Ozone and Storm.. The Storm is the only one with UMTS.
But when you support users who live or work in every single state in the USA, it's a no brainer what network you go with. Network good, device choice bad though.
lhafford @ Jul 8th 2009 1:01PM
There has never been an XX30 device with Wi-Fi, and probably never will be; this is not a VZW issue. If you want Wi-Fi, you'll have to get an XX20 device which also happens to be GSM only.
el Capitan @ Jul 8th 2009 2:02PM
@Dorf
Money wasn't the issue (tho VZW is def the most expensive). The 8830 was simply unreliable abroad. We've had problems in
Denmark
Spain
England
Germany
Norway
Italy
Singapore
China
Bermuda
only Korea works fine.
Probs would range from callers being sent direct to voicemail, no data, all SMS of 24h arriving at one time, no SMS being sent/received. Even sending SMS from here to phones in Denmark and Italy was not possible. Frankly a nightmare. Though VZW tech support tried hard to figure it out, nothing came of it.
We've been 10 months with T-Mobile now, and while reception sucks outside cities, we have not had a single problem abroad. Knock on Wood.
mike @ Jul 14th 2009 2:33PM
In the past, I think it made sense that verizon would nerf wifi on smartphones because they wanted to push their data plans. However, now that they are forcing it on anyone with a new smartphone OR plan, I think they should be encouraging wifi to reduce network load (I bought an old smartphone off contract, but they still forced me on it when I got a new plan though they initially told me they wouldn't). That said, I think some sort of consumer group should file a lawsuit or something against verizon. It seems wrong to force people to purchase products they don't want and can't use. In my case, I spend a good chunk of my time in a building that doesn't have verizon service. As a result, I initially $70/month for a brick in my pocket 8 hours a day. The only saving grace has been a miniSD wifi card. However, I still don't need/want the service plan. For people living in places without data coverage (even if that is a corner case), it seems wrong to force the data on them simply because they want a cooler phone even if they buy it at full price.
asoccer345 @ Jul 7th 2009 1:46PM
Looks like every other blackberry I've seen.
NeoJew @ Jul 7th 2009 1:47PM
I'm using a Storm now, and I'm fine with it, but aside from the touch screen, can this do everything the Storm can?
Geoff @ Jul 7th 2009 2:09PM
Yep, minus (hopefully) the crappy lag/bugs we have even with the latest hybrid OS's. Can't wait to get rid of my Storm for the Tour.
grydlok @ Jul 7th 2009 1:56PM
I hope comes for sprint by the 18th. So I can return my curve.
cocoviper @ Jul 7th 2009 2:09PM
Sprint has already said they are launching it the same day as Verizon (the 12th if I'm not mistaken).
Jason @ Jul 7th 2009 1:59PM
I do not understand the lack of wifi. You can NOT get a black berry with out the data plan so they are getting that revenue so why would want more load on the network?
rusty @ Jul 7th 2009 2:05PM
Man, VZW signal at my house is decent, but sometimes drops out of EVDO to 1X. I would really like wifi on this puppy.
With that said, I had the bold for a few weeks, and the wifi was so horrifically done, I dont know if it would be a plus on here anyway. Medianet? I never did figure out what the heck that was. But on the bold you had to use a specific browser for wifi. It was so stupid I never used it.