I've always wondered what the relative costs were of keeping two models instead of just using a tri-band chip. The tri-band chip would be more expensive per-unit but then that means you have to produce two separate models, complicating inventory management and production.
I figure since both HTC and Nokia are doing the 2+ models they did the calculations for themselves but then again tri-band 3G is a feature, though its hard to make a monetary case for more sales. Interestingly enough there were as many tri-band phones in 2007 (Kaiser/Tilt, K850i) but the trend now seems to be either way (X1a vs X1i, Fuze vs Touch Pro, Euro Nokia vs US Nokia) with a few tri-bands (iPhone 3G, Bold).
Of course then there is the T-Mobile 1700 headache...
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
YpoCaramel @ Dec 14th 2008 8:22PM
I've always wondered what the relative costs were of keeping two models instead of just using a tri-band chip. The tri-band chip would be more expensive per-unit but then that means you have to produce two separate models, complicating inventory management and production.
I figure since both HTC and Nokia are doing the 2+ models they did the calculations for themselves but then again tri-band 3G is a feature, though its hard to make a monetary case for more sales. Interestingly enough there were as many tri-band phones in 2007 (Kaiser/Tilt, K850i) but the trend now seems to be either way (X1a vs X1i, Fuze vs Touch Pro, Euro Nokia vs US Nokia) with a few tri-bands (iPhone 3G, Bold).
Of course then there is the T-Mobile 1700 headache...