That's not exactly what "open" means. In this context, it is open to phone manufacturers; the application platform is quite restricted (basically, JAVA).
Also, nowhere does "open" mean disallowing restrictions for 3rd party apps. A typical Linux system, for instance, has pretty strict restrictions on what specific applications can do (for instance, the BIND name service typically runs with privileges that are unique to it, but which prevents it from touching files/resources that is owned by the system).
There is nothing that says the "open" Android platform could not have a mandatory (rather than optional) restriction of network access.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Tor Slettnes @ Dec 11th 2008 7:01AM
That's not exactly what "open" means. In this context, it is open to phone manufacturers; the application platform is quite restricted (basically, JAVA).
Also, nowhere does "open" mean disallowing restrictions for 3rd party apps. A typical Linux system, for instance, has pretty strict restrictions on what specific applications can do (for instance, the BIND name service typically runs with privileges that are unique to it, but which prevents it from touching files/resources that is owned by the system).
There is nothing that says the "open" Android platform could not have a mandatory (rather than optional) restriction of network access.