<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for AT&amp;T dreams of single smartphone OS, will probably keep dreaming</title>
<link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/12/05/atandt-dreams-of-single-smartphone-os-will-probably-keep-dreaming/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for AT&amp;T dreams of single smartphone OS, will probably keep dreaming</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T dreams of single smartphone OS, will probably keep dreaming]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/12/05/atandt-dreams-of-single-smartphone-os-will-probably-keep-dreaming/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/12/05/atandt-dreams-of-single-smartphone-os-will-probably-keep-dreaming/</guid><description><![CDATA[Seriously...how do these types of people come into power?  You don't see Comcast or TWC trying to make everyone use the same computer OS to get on their network. There is always going to be multiple OS options to choose from when buying a cellphone.    The wireless telcos need to realize that they are nothing more than a pipeline.   ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2008 6:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T dreams of single smartphone OS, will probably keep dreaming]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/12/05/atandt-dreams-of-single-smartphone-os-will-probably-keep-dreaming/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/12/05/atandt-dreams-of-single-smartphone-os-will-probably-keep-dreaming/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually, its kinda obvious from his statement that he's ONLY referring to "ATT BRANDED SMARTPHONES" for which he wants to standardize the OS.<br>ie. ATT Tilt, Fuze, etc.<br><br>And he confirms that by saying that iphone wouldnt conflict since it is a "third-party device tapping into AT&T's technologies".<br>Which would mean Rim would be in the clear as well.<br><br>His statement seems very clear to me.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[flooty333]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2008 8:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T dreams of single smartphone OS, will probably keep dreaming]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/12/05/atandt-dreams-of-single-smartphone-os-will-probably-keep-dreaming/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/12/05/atandt-dreams-of-single-smartphone-os-will-probably-keep-dreaming/</guid><description><![CDATA[No love for Android?  Come on!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PH0ENIX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2008 8:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T dreams of single smartphone OS, will probably keep dreaming]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/12/05/atandt-dreams-of-single-smartphone-os-will-probably-keep-dreaming/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/12/05/atandt-dreams-of-single-smartphone-os-will-probably-keep-dreaming/</guid><description><![CDATA[sounds like a good idea to me, I hope they do it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MidnightDT]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2008 8:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T dreams of single smartphone OS, will probably keep dreaming]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/12/05/atandt-dreams-of-single-smartphone-os-will-probably-keep-dreaming/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/12/05/atandt-dreams-of-single-smartphone-os-will-probably-keep-dreaming/</guid><description><![CDATA[Seriously? Symbian as the standardized OS on AT&T phones IN THE USA?! If they want people to switch over to T-Mobile for choices then go for it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fyreblazer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2008 10:08AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T dreams of single smartphone OS, will probably keep dreaming]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/12/05/atandt-dreams-of-single-smartphone-os-will-probably-keep-dreaming/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/12/05/atandt-dreams-of-single-smartphone-os-will-probably-keep-dreaming/</guid><description><![CDATA[AT&T is a carrier not and a OS provider, then they need to deal with OS ecosystem.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseali]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2008 12:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T dreams of single smartphone OS, will probably keep dreaming]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/12/05/atandt-dreams-of-single-smartphone-os-will-probably-keep-dreaming/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/12/05/atandt-dreams-of-single-smartphone-os-will-probably-keep-dreaming/</guid><description><![CDATA[Amazing. No one can read. Third paragraph:<br><br>"The consolidation effort is focused on a completely AT&T-branded smart phone, distinct from the iPhone and other products that may use AT&T’s network, Smith said in an interview following his speech."<br><br>That's not just iPhones, that's every smartphone on the market today that uses AT&T's network. AT&T doesn't have any self-branded smartphones. The Fuze is the HTC Fuze. You can say what you want about the Tilt, but it's HTC and we're talking about the future, and the Fuze is not ATT branded.<br><br>Get a grip, guys. And maybe some reading glasses, too.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Who?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2008 1:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T dreams of single smartphone OS, will probably keep dreaming]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/12/05/atandt-dreams-of-single-smartphone-os-will-probably-keep-dreaming/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/12/05/atandt-dreams-of-single-smartphone-os-will-probably-keep-dreaming/</guid><description><![CDATA[HTC Touch Diamond branded by AT&T, is an AT&T Fuze..<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[drannan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2008 9:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T dreams of single smartphone OS, will probably keep dreaming]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/12/05/atandt-dreams-of-single-smartphone-os-will-probably-keep-dreaming/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/12/05/atandt-dreams-of-single-smartphone-os-will-probably-keep-dreaming/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sorry, wrong. First, it's a Touch Pro. Second, it's called the HTC Fuze.<br><br><a href="http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phone-details/?device=HTC+FUZE(TM)&q_sku=sku3090226" rel="nofollow">http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phone-details/?device=HTC+FUZE(TM)&q_sku=sku3090226</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Who?]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 8th 2008 11:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T dreams of single smartphone OS, will probably keep dreaming]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/12/05/atandt-dreams-of-single-smartphone-os-will-probably-keep-dreaming/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/12/05/atandt-dreams-of-single-smartphone-os-will-probably-keep-dreaming/</guid><description><![CDATA[um guys<br><br>why did you guys post a basic phone (Nokia 2610) with a article related to smartphone OS's?<br>that makes NO sence<br><br>maybe a no cross across Blackberry OS, Windows Mobile, and Android logos and then a :-) on the symban logo or something but seriously, not this]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nawaid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 6th 2008 1:57AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>