http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/11/13/htc-touch-hd-review-roundup/ Engadget Mobile Comments for HTC Touch HD review roundup http://www.engadgetmobile.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadgetmobile.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/11/13/htc-touch-hd-review-roundup/http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/11/13/htc-touch-hd-review-roundup/I thought that AT&T ran on those some bands??

I guess I am wrong on that.]]>Nov 13th 2008 3:39PMhttp://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/11/13/htc-touch-hd-review-roundup/http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/11/13/htc-touch-hd-review-roundup/Nov 13th 2008 10:53PMhttp://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/11/13/htc-touch-hd-review-roundup/http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/11/13/htc-touch-hd-review-roundup/
The 3G may not work in the USA, but it does elswhere, like in the UK where high-end devices sell by the boat load.]]>Nov 13th 2008 4:02PMhttp://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/11/13/htc-touch-hd-review-roundup/http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/11/13/htc-touch-hd-review-roundup/Nov 13th 2008 4:46PMhttp://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/11/13/htc-touch-hd-review-roundup/http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/11/13/htc-touch-hd-review-roundup/
@Ed. I believe ATT has licenses in the 2100 band, but they aren't using them yet for service and are probably saving them for future deployment (4G/faster 3G) or to fill gaps in markets they lack enough slots on the 850/1900 bands. The problem is there is almost impossible to find the exact street level map of coverage which indicated the bands.]]>Nov 13th 2008 5:15PMhttp://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/11/13/htc-touch-hd-review-roundup/http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/11/13/htc-touch-hd-review-roundup/
now true im not a big fan of very expensive phones since i can confidently say, i have NEVER had a phone that WASNT a piece of crap and ive had about 10 different ones over the years. i just cant get over the notion that if i pay upwards of $500 on a device, it might not always function properly. and with these reviews constantly talking about how sluggish such-and-such phone is and how it lacks this-and-that, i dont really see that changing any time soon. i'd say about $350 would be my limit right now and that limits me almost exclusively to subsidized phones.]]>Nov 14th 2008 3:11AMhttp://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/11/13/htc-touch-hd-review-roundup/http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/11/13/htc-touch-hd-review-roundup/
http://gadgetsgamesandstuff.blogspot.com]]>Nov 13th 2008 7:21PMhttp://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/11/13/htc-touch-hd-review-roundup/http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/11/13/htc-touch-hd-review-roundup/Nov 14th 2008 10:36AMhttp://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/11/13/htc-touch-hd-review-roundup/http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/11/13/htc-touch-hd-review-roundup/Nov 14th 2008 1:12PMhttp://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/11/13/htc-touch-hd-review-roundup/http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/11/13/htc-touch-hd-review-roundup/You've got to see one with your own eyes.]]>Nov 14th 2008 7:16PMhttp://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/11/13/htc-touch-hd-review-roundup/http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/11/13/htc-touch-hd-review-roundup/Nov 14th 2008 3:40PMhttp://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/11/13/htc-touch-hd-review-roundup/http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/11/13/htc-touch-hd-review-roundup/]]>Nov 23rd 2008 10:59AM