<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Pantech C610 shows up on AT&amp;T</title>
<link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/10/07/pantech-c610-shows-up-on-atandt/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Pantech C610 shows up on AT&amp;T</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Pantech C610 shows up on AT&amp;T]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/10/07/pantech-c610-shows-up-on-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/10/07/pantech-c610-shows-up-on-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's an entry level phone.  Why Bluetooth 1.2 so "lame"?   At this point anyone who gets this phone is shying away from anything that isn't cheap or simple.  <br><br>No need for BT 2.0 with this device.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kermit24]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 7th 2008 10:55AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>