i-mate's rumored "Hummer" -- for when you absolutely, positively don't care what it looks like
Say, for a moment, that Windows Mobile is Planet Earth; if the Touch Diamond lies somewhere around the North Pole, then we think you'd find this one freezing its ass off down in Antarctica. It's a stretch of an analogy, we know, but it's difficult to express just how different (and by "different" we mean "less attractive") i-mate's rumored "Hummer" is than some of its Windows Mobile 6.1 contemporaries. Granted, it does HSDPA, WiFi, and it's supposed to be ruggedized -- but we're not really convinced that exposed screws were the right way to get that point across. Then again, most of the devices rumored out of the house of i-mate from last year didn't make it to production, and this one may very well not either, so why sweat it?















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Eduardo @ Sep 8th 2008 9:05PM
I thought that was a skin, looks but ugly to me.
Elias C. @ Sep 8th 2008 10:56PM
They used baby blue to express rugged? Well, thats where the problem starts.
projectdecember @ Sep 9th 2008 9:14PM
Is it just me or do all of imate's phones look like shit of the highest order?
Hush @ Sep 9th 2008 8:32AM
It's not you. They look like that. It seems HTC and Samsung are the only real WinMo Pro contenders out there. Still, even after years of Inventec trying.
Mr. H @ Sep 8th 2008 11:59PM
Maybe the actual appeal of this phone lies in what its name suggests...
Chris Are @ Sep 9th 2008 1:48PM
That's what I was thinking. To all the jackasses that own Hummers (or H2 or H3s) this is the ultimate accessory. Even though it looks like shit.
theguy @ Sep 9th 2008 7:19PM
whoosh... thats the sound of that one going way over chris's head
Toptier @ Sep 9th 2008 9:13AM
The phone looks tuff.......if its dimensions are right and the phone is waterproof, nice. I like it!
striggity @ Sep 9th 2008 2:40PM
this phone would be awesome looking if it weren't so ugly.
John @ Sep 9th 2008 9:11PM
It's too bad that all phones aren't rugged, e.g. are waterproof, have a case and screen that can't be easily scratched and can take a drop from ear height and still function. Seems like BS that you pay $300 for an iPhone or $700 for an N96 and you can pretty much brick them by dropping them on the sidewalk or spilling your drink on them. Given that most people take their phones everywhere I would think manufacturers would see ruggedness as a competitive advantage, not a niche market just for construction workers.