<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Sketchy claims, pictures of first AT&amp;T Touch Pro emerge</title>
<link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/08/11/sketchy-claims-pictures-of-first-atandt-touch-pro-emerge/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Sketchy claims, pictures of first AT&amp;T Touch Pro emerge</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sketchy claims, pictures of first AT&amp;T Touch Pro emerge]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/08/11/sketchy-claims-pictures-of-first-atandt-touch-pro-emerge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/08/11/sketchy-claims-pictures-of-first-atandt-touch-pro-emerge/</guid><description><![CDATA[The only AT&T branding is on the home screen background, and I see no screenshots showing the 3G connection indicator.<br><br>I think the kid got duped into paying $900 for a crippled phone that half the memory and only GSM service on the network he uses.<br><br>Should've waited a couple months for the real thing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cornelius]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2008 9:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sketchy claims, pictures of first AT&amp;T Touch Pro emerge]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/08/11/sketchy-claims-pictures-of-first-atandt-touch-pro-emerge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/08/11/sketchy-claims-pictures-of-first-atandt-touch-pro-emerge/</guid><description><![CDATA[AT&T wouldn't use the globe branding on a phone. Fake. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paco Loco]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2008 10:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sketchy claims, pictures of first AT&amp;T Touch Pro emerge]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/08/11/sketchy-claims-pictures-of-first-atandt-touch-pro-emerge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/08/11/sketchy-claims-pictures-of-first-atandt-touch-pro-emerge/</guid><description><![CDATA[You obviously aren't familier with AT&T branding then.....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zephxiii]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2008 1:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sketchy claims, pictures of first AT&amp;T Touch Pro emerge]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/08/11/sketchy-claims-pictures-of-first-atandt-touch-pro-emerge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/08/11/sketchy-claims-pictures-of-first-atandt-touch-pro-emerge/</guid><description><![CDATA[So is there any confirmation that either AT & T or Tmobile are going to use this phone.   I've been an omnipoint/tmobile customer for 10+ years, but I am getting tired of my MDA  (passed on the wing)<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jvoss]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2008 11:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sketchy claims, pictures of first AT&amp;T Touch Pro emerge]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/08/11/sketchy-claims-pictures-of-first-atandt-touch-pro-emerge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/08/11/sketchy-claims-pictures-of-first-atandt-touch-pro-emerge/</guid><description><![CDATA["Couple of months for the real thing"?  do you know something the rest of us don't?  Cough it up if you do.  I haven't heard one peep on anything WM related coming to AT&T, and it is very frustrating.  No fall lineup, no information form AT&T, or gossip either.  It is quiet, too quiet.  With the iPhone 3G out, I am seriously thinking about jumping ship rather than waiting for who knows what.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chad]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2008 11:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sketchy claims, pictures of first AT&amp;T Touch Pro emerge]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/08/11/sketchy-claims-pictures-of-first-atandt-touch-pro-emerge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/08/11/sketchy-claims-pictures-of-first-atandt-touch-pro-emerge/</guid><description><![CDATA[I just want to confirm that the HTC Touch Pro is coming to AT&T.  I actually played with a test unit for a couple of weeks.  It had full AT&T branding and some AT&T apps (AT&T Mall, CV, Music, etc.).  I have no info on when it will actually be released.<br><br>It was a nice phone, but the battery life was not that great.  After average day's use, calls, 3G browsing, some bluetooth and WiFi activity, it was almost done.  The touch screen is a little 'stiff' too.  You have to press fairly hard for it to recognize your finger.  It also had no GPS app and I couldn't get Google Maps to install.  It is also rather thick.  I was eager to get this phone, but after a week, I'll pass.  I'm hoping my test unit wasn't the final production unit and they fix the stiff screen and poor battery life.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Wiley C]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2008 11:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sketchy claims, pictures of first AT&amp;T Touch Pro emerge]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/08/11/sketchy-claims-pictures-of-first-atandt-touch-pro-emerge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/08/11/sketchy-claims-pictures-of-first-atandt-touch-pro-emerge/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is very good news! That is, if the phone is released for sure. <br>Saving hundreds on the subsidized version would be very nice...$600-$800 is just way too much for a phone...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Austin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2008 4:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sketchy claims, pictures of first AT&amp;T Touch Pro emerge]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/08/11/sketchy-claims-pictures-of-first-atandt-touch-pro-emerge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/08/11/sketchy-claims-pictures-of-first-atandt-touch-pro-emerge/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree, which is why I have to wait for some good phones to be available with US carriers rather than buying them unlocked overseas. If it were up to me, I would have already bought an HTC Touch Diamond already, but $700 is way to much for me :(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rehs]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 11th 2008 9:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sketchy claims, pictures of first AT&amp;T Touch Pro emerge]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/08/11/sketchy-claims-pictures-of-first-atandt-touch-pro-emerge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/08/11/sketchy-claims-pictures-of-first-atandt-touch-pro-emerge/</guid><description><![CDATA[My initial thoughts were "Oh, someone just copied some AT&T files into a European Touch Pro," but upon further examination, there's no front-facing camera and there's a globe hardware key on the keyboard picture in the original post.<br><br>Still though, there were AT&T-branded N95's that never saw the light of day...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Louis]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 12th 2008 1:06AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>