wasn't the original iPhone de for 5 years. I was expecting 2012, not 2010. That means we will now see a CDMA iPhone sooner than previously thought. The whole $199 iPhone thing real did have an affect on the contract. This is good news for all the people who didn't want to switch to AT&T. Now u only got to wait 2 years instead of 4.
Exactly... seems to me like Ma Bell did the giving up. It was explicitly stated that it was a 5 year exclusive beginning in 2007. This is Apple leveraging it's power in controlling the most desirable mobile device on the planet.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
fini @ Aug 1st 2008 7:50PM
wasn't the original iPhone de for 5 years. I was expecting 2012, not 2010. That means we will now see a CDMA iPhone sooner than previously thought. The whole $199 iPhone thing real did have an affect on the contract. This is good news for all the people who didn't want to switch to AT&T. Now u only got to wait 2 years instead of 4.
Todd M. @ Aug 1st 2008 8:33PM
Exactly... seems to me like Ma Bell did the giving up. It was explicitly stated that it was a 5 year exclusive beginning in 2007. This is Apple leveraging it's power in controlling the most desirable mobile device on the planet.
helixtimestwo @ Aug 1st 2008 11:17PM
Verizon is moving towards LTE (GSM evoulution) In the US, so CDMA will be limited to Sprint by 2012.
By then we'll hopefully see an iPhone that can be used on either network
Navi Thach @ Aug 2nd 2008 4:07AM
I would love to see a CDMA or LTE iPhone - I'm sick of the LG garbage VZW peddles.