Walt Mossberg reviews the iPhone 3G, isn't that impressed (now with more David Pogue and Ed Baig!)
Well this was bound to happen. Ahead of schedule, Walt Mossberg has turned his official review of the new iPhone 3G, and we've got the recap. On the whole, Walt stays mostly positive about the device; he likes the form factor (which he wants to stress really hasn't changed much), says the 3G speeds are a big improvement over EDGE (no kidding?), and informs us that the audio quality and phone reception are -- thankfully -- improved all around. Downsides? There are plenty. Mossberg takes issue with AT&T's new pricing policy, which he finds steep, says he barely squeezed 4 hours and 27 minutes of talk time out of the battery, and gripes that you can only sync Exchange or personal calendars and contacts -- not both. If you're like us, you'll probably want to just read the whole thing. Too lazy? Check the video after the break.
Update: David Pogue of the New York Times has also turned in a kinda-sorta review of the iPhone 3G, though it reads more like an overview of its features than a honest-to-goodness critique. He also makes passing reference to the GPS antenna being "too small" to function as a proper GPS, which makes roughly zero sense to us. Feel free to figure it out on your own.
Update 2: Can't forget Ed Baig of USA Today, who says the new model is "worth the wait" (not to say we have any option at this point anyway, seeing how hard it is to find an original anywhere). He seemed to have trouble picking up 3G service in some locations, though it's not clear whether that can be chalked up to technical issues with the handset or a lack of coverage where he was testing. Like the others, Baig discovered a noticeable improvement in audio quality and a noticeable hit in battery life when hooked up to the 3G network. Gotta pay to play, we guess.
Update: David Pogue of the New York Times has also turned in a kinda-sorta review of the iPhone 3G, though it reads more like an overview of its features than a honest-to-goodness critique. He also makes passing reference to the GPS antenna being "too small" to function as a proper GPS, which makes roughly zero sense to us. Feel free to figure it out on your own.
Update 2: Can't forget Ed Baig of USA Today, who says the new model is "worth the wait" (not to say we have any option at this point anyway, seeing how hard it is to find an original anywhere). He seemed to have trouble picking up 3G service in some locations, though it's not clear whether that can be chalked up to technical issues with the handset or a lack of coverage where he was testing. Like the others, Baig discovered a noticeable improvement in audio quality and a noticeable hit in battery life when hooked up to the 3G network. Gotta pay to play, we guess.





















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
sharppay @ Jul 8th 2008 11:26PM
The Fanboys are gonna tear him a new one for this!!
carlo2 @ Jul 9th 2008 1:49AM
ooh, is commenting turned off?
Chris B. @ Jul 9th 2008 1:48AM
Apple fanman here. Gotta see the device for myself, however, Walt's input sounds pretty realistic although it won't make a single dent in sales, me thinks?
I can dig his gripes, but if I want one, my alternative is what? Get the iPhone 4G, or pay up and get on the wahambulance?
Joshua - thanks for the synopsis!
carlo2 @ Jul 9th 2008 1:52AM
As a fan-person [sic], what is your motivation for ditching your old one? Do you live in an area with 3G? Is the GPS worth it to you?
I guess two phones for 498 (399 and 199) over the period of a year isn't bad... then if you sold the former for 200 or so, 298... not too bad a deal I guess.
I'm really curious.
Chris B. @ Jul 9th 2008 10:59PM
I just ditched the old iPhone a while ago. I live in a 3G area (PDX), but ATTWS really overuses AMR-HR in this area, and voice quality really blows chunks in some of the outlying areas. I'm now using a Moto Z9 that's SEEM edited for better voice quality, but the Moto Synergy interface also blows chunks.
I also use a GPS - a TomTom GO 910. Not a great device because the maps aren't accurate (my update's only about 4 months old) and their traffic servers are not really reliable (last time they were down the duration was 5 weeks - for a paid service?). GPS on an iPhone - meh, I'd rather have a real GPS with reliable traffic, and TomTom's map updates are pretty expensive.
I like the potential for the platform, but I'll have to see what an iPhone sounds like in 2G and 2.5G areas first. I'll go into one of the stores, turn off the 3G radio and make a few calls to check it out. If the voice quality isn't that great it's a no-go - until those clever Ruskies figure out how to disable AMR-HR! Also, I tether - I'm hoping that ATTWS changes their data policies about tethering on the iPhone, and I'm willing to pay extra for the capability, those USB modems are just too easy to lose.
About the fan-man thing, I'm in my mid-30s, 6'7", 240 lbs. - fanboy just really doesn't fit me...
carlo2 @ Jul 9th 2008 1:48AM
Hm. He didn't say anything about the build quality. I guess it must not seem any different. I don't think "fanboys" will tear him apart. He didn't really say enough to potentially get torn apart for, except for possibly battery life. That's pretty poor performance. Or, by whining that the data plans for ATT are already more than 30 bucks so the iPhone's is cheaper anyway...
I'm tired of this topic, but it's like checking out plane crashes on youtube. I'm hooked. It's like reality tv... but worse!
Mez Jr @ Jul 9th 2008 1:51AM
Not a lot new here, but it looks to be a pretty balanced rational review.
Is it a perfect phone? No.
Is it a fantastic fit for some people (me)? Yes.
lazylittleboy @ Jul 9th 2008 5:55AM
Wow, Mossberg actually kept it real and brought up how the data plan actually makes the phone more expensive. Nothing new here, this just follows the usual plan of the carrier subsidizing the "free" phone and getting you on the contract plan. It's no wonder we American's don't believe in spending top dollar on mobile phones which in turn keeps our mobile infrastructure immature. "Why move to 3G networks when the RAZR being given out for free doesn't use it?!"
Brad Johnson @ Jul 9th 2008 9:56AM
Ughhhh!!! Not what I wanted to hear but exactly what I NEEDED to hear.
I am in love with the whole idead of 3G speed but if I have to take a hit on battery life and have to pay $15 more per month ($10 3G + $5 text) then this could very well keep me out of the Apple Store on Friday.
Additionally, the new OS with SDK and MobileMe are improving my OG iPhone and waiting would do three things that I can see right now:
1. Price would go down.
2. Give 3rd party developers time to put out a combo case/external battery/A2DP stereo bluetooth.
3. 32GB version could come out around Christmas.
4. Gives time for extensive reviews to document pros and cons and potential bugs.
5. Gives me time to play with new OS, SDK and MobileMe.
Conclusion: The smart play would be to wait but I'll probably be in the Apple Store on Friday trying to plunk my $300 down on a white 3G because I would enjoy playing with a new device and being able to play an active part in the community of users experiencing this new device together.
Jeff @ Jul 9th 2008 10:28AM
Take a dose of reality Walt and others...
Like it or not - the data plans are in line with AT&T's other PDA phones. The Q, Blackjack, Blackjack II, Tilt, Duo, Blackberrys.... They ALL are $30 for "Personal" data and $45 for "Enterprise Data." Expensive? Yeah - especially for personal when you think regular MediaNet is just $15. But that's the way it is.
The fact is that iPhone users are spoiled with their previous pricing. $20 was cheap. I was jealous - I couldn't afford $400 for a phone, I bought the Q instead - but paid $30!
The fact is that this phone is cheaper due to AT&T's subsidies, and therefore, this will fall in line with all other phones.
totalcruiser @ Jul 9th 2008 10:35AM
Pretty fair review; speaking as someone who has paid ridiculous prices for Verizon's crippled phones and unlimited (much slower) data over the past few years, both the 3G iphone and and data plans are sounding pretty good to me.
miklm @ Jul 9th 2008 10:46AM
Boo hoo about the "increased" data costs -- for those of us who have been using smartphones for years, this is nothing new. I'm paying more than that already on a Verizon BlackBerry data plan, and have been paying equal or more for years on various Treo/WinMo/BB phones/plans, without the benefit of 3G (EVDO) until recently.
I guess if you're coming from a Razr or some trendy POS dumbphone like the Chocolate or LG EnV or somesuch rubbish, these plans may seem expensive. But for real users, its just part of it. You've been getting a break at $20 on the original iPhone for a year, so time to pay up to play on the faster network.
The only thing I see missing is tethering, and that seems like one of those things that will keep the iPhone out of serious business use unless its quickly addressed by a 3rd party app or AT&T. I pay a $15 premium to tether my BlackBerry on Verizon now.
I'm waiting to see if our corporate discount on the monthly plans (voice+data) is honored, if so I'm in for a pair of iPhone 3Gs because I'm tired of several BlackBerry "features" on Verizon ($$$ for GPS which I refuse to pay for, no update yet for OS4.5, no HTML email, reliant on RIM BIS which goes down, can't tie to Exchange......)
The entry price is fair, the plans put it in line with every other smartphone, and 3G + Exchange support is the "killer app" that's kept me away from the 1st gen. I'm no fan of AT&T, but Verizon isn't exactly going out of their way to keep me loyal either, so I'm carrier agnostic since I've moved to an area with universally good coverage.
jj @ Jul 9th 2008 1:40PM
"He also makes passing reference to the GPS antenna being "too small" to function as a proper GPS, which makes roughly zero sense to us. Feel free to figure it out on your own."
how can this make ZERO sense to you? the iphone DOES NOT have REAL GPS navigation but just GPS location. If it had a REAL GPS antenna found in GPS systems then it could function as a GPS NAVIGATOR and not just a location pin pointer. all the other companies managed to get a real gps antenna into their phones for example the samsung instinct and almost every vzw flip phone.
but what else can you say? this is just yet another feature the iphone is lacking. there really is no real reason to purchase this over priced featureless phone when compared to the competition