What does AT&T's BlackBerry Bold look like?

by Chris Ziegler, posted May 19th 2008 at 9:29AM

Well, like any other BlackBerry Bold, of course -- save for that AT&T logo down there and a custom skin that owners are sure to quickly replace. Unless you're John Mayer, this'll have to do for the time being.

[Thanks, Sunil M.]

Filed under: Handsets, RIM, ATT

Tags: 9000, att, blackberry, blackberry bold, bold

Subscribe to these comments

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Lowest Ranked

Brandon @ May 19th 2008 10:16AM

Um, the phone pictured clearly isn't the Bold...

But it gets the point across, I guess.

Neutral

steven @ May 19th 2008 10:41AM

yeah really!
all that has changed is the theme picture! other than that its the same bold as we all have seen for weeks.

Neutral

Rob @ May 19th 2008 12:13PM

Anyone else notice that the number keys are white and not red like in the previous pictures?

Neutral

HARRYZWD @ May 19th 2008 1:32PM

i don't imagine this is what the at&t bold will look like. this looks nothing more than some stock photo with an at&t label and wallpaper put on it. (all done with photo editing software obviously) i'd say that the Bold will look exactly like it has looked all along "in the wild":

http://blog.honeyee.com/john/archives/2008/05/blackberry_bold.html

the number keys being white...that seems odd/wrong to me...only time will tell.

Neutral

Randy G @ May 19th 2008 1:53PM

Did Blackberry go to a SMALLER screen? Why get this instead of a Curve, other than to say 'I have the latest Blackberry'?

Neutral

Matt @ May 19th 2008 2:06PM

3g, wi-fi, sickness, 4.5 OS, 1 gig internal memory, etc dog!

Neutral

Chris Ziegler @ May 19th 2008 2:32PM

This is AT&T's official press photography.

Chris

Neutral

CB17 @ May 19th 2008 8:00PM

Hey CHRIS,

I just wanted to say that I'm REALLY glad that you sign your name after your comments. Otherwise, how would we have ANY idea who posted it?
(too bad there's no emoticons on here cause I wouldn't mind 3 or 4 eye rolls here).

CB17

Neutral

striggity @ May 19th 2008 3:03PM

Why are we having this argument? The only way Engadget could post that picture is if they altered a mockup/stock photo. So it's not gonna look 100% identical to the one John Mayer has retail phone.

Highly Ranked

VZWguy @ May 19th 2008 4:58PM

Brandon, how is that CLEARLY not the bold.....when that has been the image of the bold since it launched?

Neutral

Brandon @ May 19th 2008 10:40AM

I'm used to seeing the live pics, and it looks much different to me, a lot wider and more round. But looking at it again, it's pretty much the same.

Neutral

Brandon @ May 19th 2008 10:42AM

Like here: http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/2008/05/5-16-08bold.jpg

Looks different there.

Neutral

youngcalihottie @ May 19th 2008 8:13PM

i dont know what you guys arent understanding about Chris clearly saying "This is AT&T's official press photography." lol. so why are there talks of EM altering a Bold pic to add the att logo?

Anyway...

Anyone else besides me find it interesting that the idle screen logo for GPS was changed to the Clock?

Neutral