<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Qualcomm suppresses "yuck" face, drops MediaFLO and ISDB-T on same chipset</title>
<link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/05/16/qualcomm-suppresses-yuck-face-drops-mediaflo-and-isdb-t-on-sa/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Qualcomm suppresses "yuck" face, drops MediaFLO and ISDB-T on same chipset</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm suppresses "yuck" face, drops MediaFLO and ISDB-T on same chipset]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/05/16/qualcomm-suppresses-yuck-face-drops-mediaflo-and-isdb-t-on-sa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/05/16/qualcomm-suppresses-yuck-face-drops-mediaflo-and-isdb-t-on-sa/</guid><description><![CDATA["Qualcomm suppresses "yuck" face, drops MediaFLO and ISDB-T on same chipset"<br><br>they headline makes it sound like they will no longer be putting them on the same chipset. i know what you meant after reading the article, but beforehand it could go either way. just thought id let u know.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[youngcalihottie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 16th 2008 5:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm suppresses "yuck" face, drops MediaFLO and ISDB-T on same chipset]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/05/16/qualcomm-suppresses-yuck-face-drops-mediaflo-and-isdb-t-on-sa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/05/16/qualcomm-suppresses-yuck-face-drops-mediaflo-and-isdb-t-on-sa/</guid><description><![CDATA[I just want to know that why, after 2 years of MediaFLO being live, that there are no standalone devices? HMMmmm?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[rock99rock]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 16th 2008 8:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm suppresses "yuck" face, drops MediaFLO and ISDB-T on same chipset]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/05/16/qualcomm-suppresses-yuck-face-drops-mediaflo-and-isdb-t-on-sa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/05/16/qualcomm-suppresses-yuck-face-drops-mediaflo-and-isdb-t-on-sa/</guid><description><![CDATA[I really want MediaFLO to just go die or something. Can't America have a decent free mobilt TV standard (like ISDB-T, which has multitudes of drool-worthy Japanese standalone devices that support it)?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 16th 2008 9:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Qualcomm suppresses "yuck" face, drops MediaFLO and ISDB-T on same chipset]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/05/16/qualcomm-suppresses-yuck-face-drops-mediaflo-and-isdb-t-on-sa/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/05/16/qualcomm-suppresses-yuck-face-drops-mediaflo-and-isdb-t-on-sa/</guid><description><![CDATA[no because everyone here wants to make $$$$$$$$$$<br><br>hopefully we'll see atsc tuners in them eventually. although it doesnt work well when being moved. oh well. maybe one day.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[youngcalihottie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2008 4:43PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>