Chinese 3G still two years away from widescale availability?
Despite ongoing trials and a groundswell of government and carrier optimism that the system would be ready in time for the Olympics this summer, at least one analyst is thinking that retail availability of China's homegrown 3G TD-SCDMA standard (and the equipment to take advantage of it) is still years away. The logic's pretty simple: historically, GSM trials have tended to last 12 to 18 months, and there's really no reason that the TD-SCDMA players would be able to effectively and reliably get it done any faster. Plus, network build-outs and handset developments take plenty of time, so they've got some work ahead of 'em. The outspoken analyst, working for Ernst & Young's global telecommunications group in Beijing, also thinks that China might end up awarding licenses for WCDMA (the underpinnings of UMTS) and CDMA2000 at the same time that TD-SCDMA licenses are handed out -- which begs the question, why'd they go through this whole rigmarole of developing their own standard to begin with?[Via Slashphone]
Filed under: Misc
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Fernando @ Apr 16th 2008 10:50PM
I for one, am rooting for TD-SCDMA, as chinese manufacturers would have to adopt it, and so it would become less likely for one of them KIRFs to leave china.
Cellenin @ Apr 17th 2008 1:35AM
They developed their own standards so that they can easily crack it (the govt would have all the keys) and listen in and monitor data traffic, come guys you already know this.
Mike @ Apr 17th 2008 2:11AM
in china, if you have money. you can get stuff done quick.
China wants its own standard because they are so proud of their nations that it is a disgrace and lose face to use someone else tech. They end up using WCDMA because it is cheaper and cost less money(China is driven by money and profit) but they have to show that they did try it because they don''t want to look stupid and lose face.
Chuck @ Apr 17th 2008 7:11AM
Seems like China has T-mobile USA beat.
Damien @ Apr 17th 2008 8:39AM
to have one's own standards means you don't have to pay loyalty to foreign companies, and it can also provide more jobs rather than losing them, why would the Chinese care about the WCDMA/CDMA2000 if they have their own, since their own market is big enough for the domestic companies.
and it's just a start, I'm sure the Chinese will have more say in 4G and future technology. I think those multi-national companies are the ones should be worried about.
John P. @ Apr 17th 2008 9:17AM
Oh come on China, just beat a couple thousand slaves into working faster like you did with all the Olympic venues. Sheesh. You Can Do It!
Aeroplan @ Apr 18th 2008 2:09PM
The logic stated in this article is flawed. If it took GSM 12-18 years to be reliable, it doesn't mean it will take the Chinese the same amount of time for TD-SCDMA to flourish. Just watch.
NuShrike @ Apr 18th 2008 11:40PM
Isn't it obvious? It's so they don't have to get screwed by Qualcomm by paying licensing royalties to technology owned by this and other evil foreign countries with possible eavesdropping backdoors.
Also, they can come up with their video drivers instead of being held hostage by companies like HTC/Qualcomm.
Adam Ko @ May 25th 2008 8:21AM
It's true. For those painful losses in 2G era they are now working really hard to change this.
BTW HTC is from China.