<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for BenQ T60: 8.9 millimeters, 3.2 megapixels</title>
<link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/04/11/benq-t60-8-9-millimeters-3-2-megapixels/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for BenQ T60: 8.9 millimeters, 3.2 megapixels</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ T60: 8.9 millimeters, 3.2 megapixels]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/04/11/benq-t60-8-9-millimeters-3-2-megapixels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/04/11/benq-t60-8-9-millimeters-3-2-megapixels/</guid><description><![CDATA[bleh, benq. I'll buy NOTHING from them, I'm still crying over what they've done to Siemens Mobile ;_;]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernando]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 11th 2008 5:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ T60: 8.9 millimeters, 3.2 megapixels]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/04/11/benq-t60-8-9-millimeters-3-2-megapixels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/04/11/benq-t60-8-9-millimeters-3-2-megapixels/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree, things were looking great when the EF81 was released (still a really good handset shame about the lack of support it got) then they go ruin things. <br><br>This looks ok, bit bland (like most BenQs). Certainly don't like the, normally, bottom row of keys being on the side, that layout was used on the Samsung P310 and isn't very easy to use.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 11th 2008 10:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ T60: 8.9 millimeters, 3.2 megapixels]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/04/11/benq-t60-8-9-millimeters-3-2-megapixels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/04/11/benq-t60-8-9-millimeters-3-2-megapixels/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's a fine looking phone. But beauty's only skin deep & unless there are some serious radios (850, dual HSDPA, etc) beneath that "next top model" shell many folks won't take a second look.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 11th 2008 5:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ T60: 8.9 millimeters, 3.2 megapixels]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/04/11/benq-t60-8-9-millimeters-3-2-megapixels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/04/11/benq-t60-8-9-millimeters-3-2-megapixels/</guid><description><![CDATA[According to GSM Arena, this thing only has GSM 900 & 1800. No EDGE, no 3G, and certainly no WiFi. Looks pretty crappy to me as far as the specs go. The phone itself is pretty, but Anthony has it right: beauty is only skin deep on this junker.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ras]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 11th 2008 7:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ T60: 8.9 millimeters, 3.2 megapixels]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/04/11/benq-t60-8-9-millimeters-3-2-megapixels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/04/11/benq-t60-8-9-millimeters-3-2-megapixels/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dudes, this is a bit of an old news :D Some "other" websites covered it since the 2nd of April. Not that it would matter too much. <br><br>The phone looks cool, too bad about its downsides.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Novembrine]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 12th 2008 3:51AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ T60: 8.9 millimeters, 3.2 megapixels]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/04/11/benq-t60-8-9-millimeters-3-2-megapixels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/04/11/benq-t60-8-9-millimeters-3-2-megapixels/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think it not benq's fault<br>gobenq!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Allen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 12th 2008 11:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ T60: 8.9 millimeters, 3.2 megapixels]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/04/11/benq-t60-8-9-millimeters-3-2-megapixels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/04/11/benq-t60-8-9-millimeters-3-2-megapixels/</guid><description><![CDATA[it's so cheap, i think ill get one for my mum.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[leeraymond]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 12th 2008 3:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BenQ T60: 8.9 millimeters, 3.2 megapixels]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/04/11/benq-t60-8-9-millimeters-3-2-megapixels/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/04/11/benq-t60-8-9-millimeters-3-2-megapixels/</guid><description><![CDATA[nice n' slims for my kickass red jeans]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[duckpoops]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2008 6:42PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>