http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/03/06/everyone-else-sued-over-picture-caller-id/ Engadget Mobile Comments for Everyone else sued over picture caller ID http://www.engadgetmobile.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadgetmobile.com en-us Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/03/06/everyone-else-sued-over-picture-caller-id/http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/03/06/everyone-else-sued-over-picture-caller-id/
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7257210.PN.&OS=PN/7257210&RS=PN/7257210

Filed in 2005. But (and this is really important), it has priority back to at least October 1996, and potentially as far back as January 1994. So, something can only be prior art if it was public before October 1996. ]]>Mar 6th 2008 11:52AMhttp://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/03/06/everyone-else-sued-over-picture-caller-id/http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/03/06/everyone-else-sued-over-picture-caller-id/Mar 6th 2008 12:03PMhttp://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/03/06/everyone-else-sued-over-picture-caller-id/http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/03/06/everyone-else-sued-over-picture-caller-id/Oh, and I guess this would work for callers not in the contact list of the receiving phone. Now it seems like a pretty good idea, although I don't know how this would work. The calling phone would have to send data out during every call? Or they would "register" an image and the carrier network would handle it? interesting...]]>Mar 6th 2008 5:19PMhttp://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/03/06/everyone-else-sued-over-picture-caller-id/http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/03/06/everyone-else-sued-over-picture-caller-id/Mar 7th 2008 11:58AM