This is ridiculous. I'm on board with the idea of "visual pollution," but I think it applies more so to advertising than this. The only distinction is that no one is pocketing any change as a result of this kind of "visual pollution." It's only purpose is the empowerment of individual expression and, let's be honest, who cares about that anymore?
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Jason @ Feb 29th 2008 3:07PM
This is ridiculous. I'm on board with the idea of "visual pollution," but I think it applies more so to advertising than this. The only distinction is that no one is pocketing any change as a result of this kind of "visual pollution." It's only purpose is the empowerment of individual expression and, let's be honest, who cares about that anymore?