We seriously have no idea what Qualcomm was thinking here, but it turns out that those two so-called "Snapdragon prototypes"
being shown at CES this year... wait for it...
don't use the Snapdragon platform. Now, that would've been just fine with us had Qualcomm made it clear that they were built using its existing chipsets, but they didn't. Here's the best part: Qualcomm actually contacted us with a minor correction on our original story (they wanted us to point out that their ARM-based cores are highly customized) without bothering to mention that our "Snapdragon-powered" statement was not accurate. Anyway, it turns out that the Anchorage and Fairbanks prototypes are merely meant to demonstrate "examples of what Snapdragon-enabled devices will feature," which begs the question: if the current MSM series chipsets are capable of the same functionality, aren't those probably the wrong features to be demonstrating? That behavior walks a fine line between poorly executed PR and outright deception, Qualcomm, and we'd ask that you not let it happen again.
[Thanks,
Sascha]
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Yubastard @ Jan 10th 2008 11:26PM
strong words!! give it to them, engadget!!
Mickey @ Jan 11th 2008 3:43AM
Yeah, and make sure you're wearing your Broadcom t-shirt when you let 'em have it. They'll be quivering at the sight of you.
NuShrike @ Jan 11th 2008 9:42AM
If Q has the time to demo underutilized features of current chipsets, how about spending some time giving us drivers for them such as real DirectX/QTV/etc drivers for the Kaiser?
Typical Q deception.
Dan @ Jan 11th 2008 10:21AM
Wow, I'm so disappointed with Qualcomm. I'm glad you guys are putting them out in the open, first they have licensing issues which clearly shows qualcomm at fault, and now they are displaying products with false specs. tsk tsk
I guess its up to Intel xcales or Samsung pda/sm cpus to help move the mobile platforms forward.