Actually, this has been out for somewhere around a year now. In fact, it has been around so long, that they have stopped selling the non-beta 3.3 version and are directing people to download the 3.4 technical preview. I'm actually kind of pissed because this is the second time the 3.4 beta has gone past the program expiration date shown on the site and built into the program and I was hoping they'd release the actual release version this time. By the way, to bessie31, the old beta actually does support lash, you just have to turn it on in "plugins" in the settings. Also, the visual bookmarks simply don't work in the version I have been using till now. Netfront Browser is really the only real competitor to Opera currently for Windows Mobile operating systems, but I tend to like Opera's rendering better and seems slightly faster on my phone. However on the plus side for Netfront is the free factor of the beta.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Ari @ Dec 5th 2007 6:20AM
Actually, this has been out for somewhere around a year now. In fact, it has been around so long, that they have stopped selling the non-beta 3.3 version and are directing people to download the 3.4 technical preview. I'm actually kind of pissed because this is the second time the 3.4 beta has gone past the program expiration date shown on the site and built into the program and I was hoping they'd release the actual release version this time. By the way, to bessie31, the old beta actually does support lash, you just have to turn it on in "plugins" in the settings. Also, the visual bookmarks simply don't work in the version I have been using till now. Netfront Browser is really the only real competitor to Opera currently for Windows Mobile operating systems, but I tend to like Opera's rendering better and seems slightly faster on my phone. However on the plus side for Netfront is the free factor of the beta.
bessie31 @ Dec 5th 2007 11:33AM
hmm, no kidding, flash? ill give this a shot after i reinstall with the new beta hahah. thanks for the tip!