Skip to Content
The described dimensions don't seem to be those of the item in the picture, which is obviously much less than 1.9 inches. So, what does the picture illustrate?
1.9" is the diagonal measurement of the visible area, not the thickness :-) but after whacking yourself on the forehead, I'm sure you knew that ;-)
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Sirocco @ Oct 23rd 2007 6:03PM
The described dimensions don't seem to be those of the item in the picture, which is obviously much less than 1.9 inches. So, what does the picture illustrate?
lorax1284 @ Oct 23rd 2007 8:18PM
1.9" is the diagonal measurement of the visible area, not the thickness :-) but after whacking yourself on the forehead, I'm sure you knew that ;-)