<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for US in-flight calling can't catch a break, ruled out for "foreseeable future"</title>
<link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for US in-flight calling can't catch a break, ruled out for "foreseeable future"</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US in-flight calling can't catch a break, ruled out for "foreseeable future"]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[If that's the case, I still can't see how people called their loved ones on those hijacked planes on 9/11. Oh I forgot, that's an unpatriotic question. Welcome to 1984.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JAmerican]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 8th 2007 10:04AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US in-flight calling can't catch a break, ruled out for "foreseeable future"]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[What? How did you go from this article to a 9/11 reference?  My guess is in that case, the passengers said "well, since I am going to die I will disregard the cellphone rule and make a few calls."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 8th 2007 11:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US in-flight calling can't catch a break, ruled out for "foreseeable future"]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[The passengers were able to make calls because the plane was flying at a very low altitude and therefore, their phones had a signal from the cell towers on the ground.  If the plane was flying at its normal cruising altitude of 30,000 feet, then passengers' cellphones wouldn't get any signal from the cell towers on the ground.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sven]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 8th 2007 12:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US in-flight calling can't catch a break, ruled out for "foreseeable future"]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[Then it was all the cellphone calls that screwed up the plane's GPS and other electronics and caused it to crash, then?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NuShrike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 8th 2007 5:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US in-flight calling can't catch a break, ruled out for "foreseeable future"]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thank heavens. I seriously do see fights breaking out if people are allowed to talk on cell phones during flights. My ballpoint pen in your neck, Mr. Chatty Seat Neighbor. AAAAAAAAGH!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kookoobirdz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 8th 2007 12:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US in-flight calling can't catch a break, ruled out for "foreseeable future"]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[The day they allow people to talk on cell phones in airplanes is the day I quit flying. It's bad enough we have to deal with screaming babies, being kneed in the back, smelly people, little or no service, rude flight attendants, and zero foot room. The last thing I want is to be stuck next to Kenny Tarmac yelling into his phone for four hours.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cory]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 8th 2007 12:49PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US in-flight calling can't catch a break, ruled out for "foreseeable future"]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[I had a pilot friend make phone calls on their phone all the time, worked fine, even at altitudes above typical commercial flights.  'I'm at 39,000 feet! Aren't I cool'.  The supposition wasn't that passengers wouldn't get a signal, but that the phone would pick up too many towers, and the phone companies billing systems couldn't handle that.<br><br>I'd really like to think that, rather than prohibit use of technology because it *might* bother someone, people would be mature enough to limit voice calls, and use SMS instead.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[johdaxx]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 8th 2007 3:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US in-flight calling can't catch a break, ruled out for "foreseeable future"]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[You've obviously never been on a budget airline flight then...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MatthewJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 8th 2007 4:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US in-flight calling can't catch a break, ruled out for "foreseeable future"]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hope airliners never allow phone calls during flight. I don't want to hear the loud-mouth lady complaining or the business person arguing. It's bad enough you hear them during "taxi-ing" but why do I have to listen to them being idiots during the WHOLE flight?<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PakieMak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 8th 2007 3:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US in-flight calling can't catch a break, ruled out for "foreseeable future"]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why don't they run it like Japanese trains where you can text/data all you want, but no voice calls?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NuShrike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 8th 2007 5:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US in-flight calling can't catch a break, ruled out for "foreseeable future"]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm not sure what's the deal here..how does anybody get a signal above a few thousand feet anyway?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 8th 2007 9:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US in-flight calling can't catch a break, ruled out for "foreseeable future"]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</guid><description><![CDATA["little exaggeration?"  you mean "elaboration," right?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Victoid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2007 2:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US in-flight calling can't catch a break, ruled out for "foreseeable future"]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[You're exaggerating.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RandyB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2007 11:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US in-flight calling can't catch a break, ruled out for "foreseeable future"]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[would you care to elaborate?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Victoid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2007 12:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US in-flight calling can't catch a break, ruled out for "foreseeable future"]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[What is missing is that all the proposals to the FAA and the FCC are not to use the currrent ground cell tower system directly. The proposals call for a device known as a "picocell" on the aircraft. This would automatically place all onboard phones in a low power mode to ensure no interference with onboard systems. The caller would access the cellular network through that system and the call would be routed to the ground network through electronics on the aircraft. That way users get to pay the ground system, the airline and the on-board service provider. Call costs are estimated at $1 per minute.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xracer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2007 12:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on US in-flight calling can't catch a break, ruled out for "foreseeable future"]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/10/08/us-in-flight-calling-gets-shot-down-again/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am glad to see the FCC has upheld the ban on Cell phone usage on airplanes. I feel more research is needed to determine the effect of cell phones on both the communications and navigation equipment on aircraft before allowing unconditional use on airplanes.<br><br>I have seen first hand the dangers of allowing the use of cellular phones during critical phases of flight such as takeoff and landing. As Captain of a flight departing Newark’s Liberty International Airport we where told by the control tower to taxi into position and hold on the runway. This command from the tower tells us to taxi onto the runway and wait for a takeoff clearance from the tower.<br><br>While in position for takeoff we heard another transmission from the tower that was garbled due to interference on the radio. The buzzing sound was similar to what I have heard when using a cordless home phone and a cellular car interference with the call. I turned to my copilot and asked “what did he say?”. Then I called the flight attendant and asked her to make an announcement that all cell phones and two way pagers such as blackberry devices are off. After the tower repeated that we where cleared for takeoff, we departed for our destination.<br><br>Communications is important especially while aircraft are operating in close proximity to each other such as during arrival and departure from an airport. This incident inspired me to do begin research on the use of cell phones on airplanes. I discovered there are studies showing cellular phones have interfered with the navigation and communications equipment on airplanes. I also have discovered that the type of cellular device has some significance in the amount of interference that is caused.<br><br>I feel we need more research to determine the safety of using cellular phones on aircraft. From discussions with passengers, I found many feel the only reason cellular phones are turned off in flight is for technical and business purposes required by the cellular phone companies. I hope from my incident more people realize safety is the reason we ask to turn phones and pagers off during flight.<br><br>For More Information:<br><br><a href="http://expertaviator.com/?p=3" rel="nofollow">http://expertaviator.com/?p=3</a><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[carlvaleri]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 3:42AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>