<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for HP iPAQ 910 coming to AT&amp;T?</title>
<link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/09/18/hp-ipaq-910-coming-to-atandt/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for HP iPAQ 910 coming to AT&amp;T?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP iPAQ 910 coming to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/09/18/hp-ipaq-910-coming-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/09/18/hp-ipaq-910-coming-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is there any indication of a release date here? The ONLY downside that I can find is the 2.5mm jack. I want this device something fierce.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 18th 2007 5:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP iPAQ 910 coming to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/09/18/hp-ipaq-910-coming-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/09/18/hp-ipaq-910-coming-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Also,<br>In the past (look at the version that the 910 is replacing) there has been no discount for buying on AT&T. If the MSRP from HP is $549, what could the AT&T price be?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 18th 2007 5:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP iPAQ 910 coming to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/09/18/hp-ipaq-910-coming-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/09/18/hp-ipaq-910-coming-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks nice but its probably not what I'm looking for]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Montusama]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 18th 2007 5:52PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP iPAQ 910 coming to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/09/18/hp-ipaq-910-coming-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/09/18/hp-ipaq-910-coming-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[I posted it @ BGR Via HoFo. <br><br>This phone will be sold on HP's website and AT&T Premier most likely, just like the hw6925 was. <br><br>So if you can order through Premier, then you will get a nice AT&T discount. Otherwise, just order the unlocked version. <br><br>No, no release date yet. I can see this replacing my 503g but we shall see. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 18th 2007 6:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP iPAQ 910 coming to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/09/18/hp-ipaq-910-coming-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/09/18/hp-ipaq-910-coming-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[I posted this at BGR, but no one seemed to answer<br><br>{Dear Boy Genius,<br><br>On page 4 of that PDF we can find the following:<br><br>“HP iPAQ 910c Business Messenger – with camera<br><br>FB050AA#ABA United States<br>FB068AA#ABA United States - commercial<br>FB070AA#ABA United States - AT&T”<br><br>Does this mean we can find it on AT&T (FB070AA) AND unlocked (FB068AA)… what about the FB050AA?<br><br>I don’t get it.<br><br>PS: how about dates? This model was announced with the 610c which you can easily find on the site, but this one you have to dig for it}]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DrNeuralgia]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 18th 2007 6:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP iPAQ 910 coming to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/09/18/hp-ipaq-910-coming-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/09/18/hp-ipaq-910-coming-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[There's no confusion at all - if HP wants to compete, they need to at least match the screen size of the Kaiser/Tilt!  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Duke]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 19th 2007 1:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP iPAQ 910 coming to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/09/18/hp-ipaq-910-coming-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/09/18/hp-ipaq-910-coming-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[No they don't. You seem to think that EVERYONE has your opinion in what is optimum in a device. I hate the form factor of the Tilt after seeing an 8525. WAY too big, and I hate the slide action. hate hate hate it. I get too many messages to be taking it out, and sliding a retarded keyboard over and over and over all day. I would much rather take it out and just start typing quickly, then put it back in my pocket. Show my how they can give it the screen size of the Tilt, AND make it small enough for people who are conscious about the size of the device. I don't think it is possible.<br><br>They make devices for different demographic. People that are serious with messaging and do it FREQUENTLY, for the most part hate sliders. Why do you think BlackBerry is still a preferred business phone? People want quick access to messaging, not dink around with a playschool toy keyboard.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Numetheus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 28th 2007 4:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HP iPAQ 910 coming to AT&amp;T?]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/09/18/hp-ipaq-910-coming-to-atandt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/09/18/hp-ipaq-910-coming-to-atandt/</guid><description><![CDATA[i agree this form factor/screen is much better than the tilts]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 9:09AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>