lustworthy in appearance??? the 8000 was a tank, the 8300 the same. neither were very attractive phones, they just start to grow on you because it's a good phone. hopefully this one lives up to the 8300.
Hey, it's just my opinion that they're good looking. I've actually never played with them, but, at the time they were released, with the external mp3 buttons and those color screens, to me, they were--and still are--nice looking phones. AT&T/Cingular wasn't offering anything that attractive, imho.
-----
Also, I don't think a phone--or people, for that matter--has to be thin to be attractive. I do own a Samsung a717 but I also own a Nokia n80, both of which are good lookin', to me. The appearance of this phone is looking kinda entry level.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
geekgrl @ Sep 14th 2007 2:02PM
lustworthy in appearance??? the 8000 was a tank, the 8300 the same. neither were very attractive phones, they just start to grow on you because it's a good phone. hopefully this one lives up to the 8300.
derX @ Sep 14th 2007 7:40PM
Hey, it's just my opinion that they're good looking. I've actually never played with them, but, at the time they were released, with the external mp3 buttons and those color screens, to me, they were--and still are--nice looking phones. AT&T/Cingular wasn't offering anything that attractive, imho.
-----
Also, I don't think a phone--or people, for that matter--has to be thin to be attractive. I do own a Samsung a717 but I also own a Nokia n80, both of which are good lookin', to me. The appearance of this phone is looking kinda entry level.