elgee02, your "Verizon can do no evil" stance has gotten so absurd you're spewing nonsense.
Verizon wants the spectrum limited to one single company. That said company would control what flows on the network. There would be no CHOICE. There would only be one company. That is the point of the open-access. Having more than one choice, means different companies would have to compete for customers. This means competition. If there was only one company Verizon could charge whatever it wanted for the service. But I think you knew this already and needed to put your Verizon defense regardless if it made sense or not.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
ShortFuse @ Sep 13th 2007 9:55PM
elgee02, your "Verizon can do no evil" stance has gotten so absurd you're spewing nonsense.
Verizon wants the spectrum limited to one single company. That said company would control what flows on the network. There would be no CHOICE. There would only be one company. That is the point of the open-access. Having more than one choice, means different companies would have to compete for customers. This means competition. If there was only one company Verizon could charge whatever it wanted for the service. But I think you knew this already and needed to put your Verizon defense regardless if it made sense or not.