<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Another lawsuit claims Apple, AT&amp;T weren't forthright about iPhone batteries</title>
<link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/08/17/lawsuit-claims-apple-atandt-werent-forthright-about-iphone-batte/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Another lawsuit claims Apple, AT&amp;T weren't forthright about iPhone batteries</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Another lawsuit claims Apple, AT&amp;T weren't forthright about iPhone batteries]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/08/17/lawsuit-claims-apple-atandt-werent-forthright-about-iphone-batte/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/08/17/lawsuit-claims-apple-atandt-werent-forthright-about-iphone-batte/</guid><description><![CDATA[I like how Engadget Tries to Cover Apples ASs. Talk about favoring a company. what ever happen to being non bias]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[El Cartel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 17th 2007 12:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Another lawsuit claims Apple, AT&amp;T weren't forthright about iPhone batteries]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/08/17/lawsuit-claims-apple-atandt-werent-forthright-about-iphone-batte/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/08/17/lawsuit-claims-apple-atandt-werent-forthright-about-iphone-batte/</guid><description><![CDATA[Personally, I don't think Engadget is being biased in this case, they are simply pointing out the facts.  The battery really is described as going through 300 cycles before its life begins to deteriorate.  Its the same with almost any battery-powered electronic device.  <br><br>The only difference is the cost of replacement =/]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[byaah]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 17th 2007 1:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Another lawsuit claims Apple, AT&amp;T weren't forthright about iPhone batteries]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/08/17/lawsuit-claims-apple-atandt-werent-forthright-about-iphone-batte/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/08/17/lawsuit-claims-apple-atandt-werent-forthright-about-iphone-batte/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't think Engadget is covering anyone's rear, but more incensed with the amount of law suits being filed over an issue, which is known before people purchased their batteries. The key issue for this case is "if there is a class-action lawsuit, which law firm gets to be lead". There is huge money there and everyone wants free money for being 'ignorant'.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[unchi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 17th 2007 2:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Another lawsuit claims Apple, AT&amp;T weren't forthright about iPhone batteries]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/08/17/lawsuit-claims-apple-atandt-werent-forthright-about-iphone-batte/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/08/17/lawsuit-claims-apple-atandt-werent-forthright-about-iphone-batte/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ummm, all Lithium-Ion batteries only last 300 charge cycles before starting to break down, depending on the temp and other conditions. Sometimes it can be less, especially in a device that gets warm, such as some cell phones and other high heat items like laptops. <br><br>Guess this idiot needs to sue the guy who invented Lithium for batteries<br><br><a href="http://www.batteryuniversity.com/parttwo-34.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.batteryuniversity.com/parttwo-34.htm</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[WirelessGuy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 17th 2007 1:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Another lawsuit claims Apple, AT&amp;T weren't forthright about iPhone batteries]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/08/17/lawsuit-claims-apple-atandt-werent-forthright-about-iphone-batte/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/08/17/lawsuit-claims-apple-atandt-werent-forthright-about-iphone-batte/</guid><description><![CDATA[Or do what the 200K+ Km hybrid cars do, don't abuse the battery by letting it get out of 40% to 80% charged range.  You can then care less about the 300 full-deep cycles.  That's the secret to keeping batteries alive a long time.<br><br>I've done that with my laptop and celphone, and I haven't had to change the batteries in 3 years, at least, and still get near new battery performance.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NuShrike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 17th 2007 4:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Another lawsuit claims Apple, AT&amp;T weren't forthright about iPhone batteries]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/08/17/lawsuit-claims-apple-atandt-werent-forthright-about-iphone-batte/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/08/17/lawsuit-claims-apple-atandt-werent-forthright-about-iphone-batte/</guid><description><![CDATA[The average consumer does not know this and neither apple nor AT&T tell you this. Besides do you honestly believe everything corporate america tells you. Just because Apple tells you something does not mean its true. Remember Apple, as well as, the rest of corporate america is after your hard earned cash. Hence, they will tell you anything to get the green.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 25th 2007 1:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Another lawsuit claims Apple, AT&amp;T weren't forthright about iPhone batteries]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/08/17/lawsuit-claims-apple-atandt-werent-forthright-about-iphone-batte/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/08/17/lawsuit-claims-apple-atandt-werent-forthright-about-iphone-batte/</guid><description><![CDATA[The following page has been on Apple's website for months. They updated it to include the links to the iPhone, but otherwise, this information has been available for a long time.<br><br><a href="http://www.apple.com/batteries/" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com/batteries/</a><br><br><a href="http://www.apple.com/batteries/iphone.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com/batteries/iphone.html</a><br><br>"Charge Cycles<br>A properly maintained iPhone battery is designed to retain up to 80% of its original capacity at 400 full charge and discharge cycles. You may choose to replace your battery when it no longer holds sufficient charge to meet your needs."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lah]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 17th 2007 1:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Another lawsuit claims Apple, AT&amp;T weren't forthright about iPhone batteries]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/08/17/lawsuit-claims-apple-atandt-werent-forthright-about-iphone-batte/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/08/17/lawsuit-claims-apple-atandt-werent-forthright-about-iphone-batte/</guid><description><![CDATA[How could any iPhone user (other than those lucky few that got them pre-release) have already accounted for 300 charging cycles? It's been 48 days since the release, as of today, and that would account for 6.25 charges PER DAY!<br><br>Somehow the numbers don't work. Some people are just geniuses I guess.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Uhhh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 17th 2007 2:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Another lawsuit claims Apple, AT&amp;T weren't forthright about iPhone batteries]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/08/17/lawsuit-claims-apple-atandt-werent-forthright-about-iphone-batte/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/08/17/lawsuit-claims-apple-atandt-werent-forthright-about-iphone-batte/</guid><description><![CDATA[It seems that Sydney is talking in terms of "cost" and engadget is interpreting it in terms of "cycles of charging".]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sandeep]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2007 11:34PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>