<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Samsung's SGH-G800: another 5 megapixel slider?</title>
<link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/30/samsungs-sgh-g800-another-5-megapixel-slider/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Samsung's SGH-G800: another 5 megapixel slider?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's SGH-G800: another 5 megapixel slider?]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/30/samsungs-sgh-g800-another-5-megapixel-slider/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/30/samsungs-sgh-g800-another-5-megapixel-slider/</guid><description><![CDATA[Very Sony-fied! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ken]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2007 3:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's SGH-G800: another 5 megapixel slider?]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/30/samsungs-sgh-g800-another-5-megapixel-slider/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/30/samsungs-sgh-g800-another-5-megapixel-slider/</guid><description><![CDATA[sony-fied or not..i feel this is a good thing having a great camera is nice instead of the craptastic 1.3 or even 2mp cameras that don't cut it.I'd rather have a kick ass camera on my phone than some mp3 player that i don't use or even shitty internet that isn't up  to snuff..IMO]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Doc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2007 4:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's SGH-G800: another 5 megapixel slider?]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/30/samsungs-sgh-g800-another-5-megapixel-slider/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/30/samsungs-sgh-g800-another-5-megapixel-slider/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm on t-mobile and I never roam in the 850 area so I wont miss that fourth band everyone else worries about.  Samsung g800 here I come! (whenever it comes out)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Owen V]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 30th 2007 8:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's SGH-G800: another 5 megapixel slider?]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/30/samsungs-sgh-g800-another-5-megapixel-slider/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/30/samsungs-sgh-g800-another-5-megapixel-slider/</guid><description><![CDATA[WHY is Sammy crippling their phones by not including GSM 850 is beyond me.  I understand that not everyone needs the "lower frequency" bands (Owen V) but I can not imagine that the price difference between 3 vs 4 band gsm chip would be that high...and Sammy would gain a bigger market.  Even if this phone would be released in the US, Samsung has a tendency to cripple their phones in lieu of North American or European marked (US tri-band 1900/850/1800 or EU tri-band 1800/900/1900).  Personally i think it's a stupid move but who am I to say anything...  I'm only the end-user so Samsung doesn't have to listen to me. (I guess that means that I will not be Sammy's client until they make Quads.  Nokia doesn't even stoop to tri-bands on their higher end phones anymore as they see the potential of quads (lower production cost and higher market coverage)<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 31st 2007 4:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung's SGH-G800: another 5 megapixel slider?]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/30/samsungs-sgh-g800-another-5-megapixel-slider/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/30/samsungs-sgh-g800-another-5-megapixel-slider/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you read the text near the lens it AF 5.8-17.4, so it's got 3x optical zoom, something SE hasn't got.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Evans]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 1st 2007 10:51AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>