
Granted, the
original report suggesting that swarms of iPhones actually broke Duke's WiFi network did seem a bit bizarre, and now it appears that the university is freeing Apple's handset from blame. Interestingly, the actual culprit still seems somewhat veiled in secrecy, as we're only informed that "a particular set of conditions made the
Duke wireless network experience some minor and temporary disruptions in service," but never do they exaggerate on exactly what caused the hiccups. Still, Duke also stated that it worked in conjunction with Cisco and
Apple in order to "identify the network issue that was causing the problem," and since Cisco stepped in and provided a fix, the prpblem has yet to repeat itself. Looks like you're off the hook on this one,
iPhone.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Tom @ Jul 21st 2007 2:43PM
I'm guessing he meant "elaborate". Pretty sad.
NuShrike @ Jul 21st 2007 3:47PM
This comment might explain it: http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=251129&cid=19886053
Something to do with Cisco's networking code was optimized for certain Microsoft quirks. Performance would degrade when devices that followed the written spec were around such as Linux or iPhones.
Robbie @ Jul 22nd 2007 2:27AM
ok. i noticed that too. but its not like its a big deal. this is just a blog. people need to realize they're not reading the New York Times Mobile. its a blog.
rseijas @ Jul 21st 2007 4:59PM
Probably some Apple Hater spouting off without bothering to check the facts. Next some moron will blame the iPhone for global warming. You just watch. It's coming. I can smell the hate.
Graham @ Jul 21st 2007 8:28PM
An iPhone ate my baby!
dingo @ Jul 22nd 2007 9:56AM
well at least im off the hook for that baby
Jon H. @ Jul 22nd 2007 9:36PM
I guess my planting the iphone at the scene of the eating worked out perfect!
John Earnhardt @ Jul 24th 2007 2:59PM
We (Cisco) posted on this issue on our blog this morning...full post can be read here:
http://blogs.cisco.com/news/2007/07/cisco_duke_university_and_appl.html