<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/</guid><description><![CDATA[No thanks, I'm waiting for the iphone shuffle.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dismal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2007 8:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh yeah? Well, I'm waiting for the iPhone Atom.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nando]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2007 9:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/</guid><description><![CDATA[while there might be a new iPhone out toward christmas (european version?), i don't think it'll be called the iPhone nano. the video iPod and the nano differ in the storage capacity and medium, so the current iPhone is already more akin to a nano than a regular iPod. there's no way to make a 60 gig iPhone without making it cost an ungodly amount of money (flash memory) or killing the battery life (hard drive), and what would even be the point of a 2 gig iPhone?<br><br>plus, as has been mentioned, typing is already hard enough on the iPhone keyboard. i shudder to think what it'll be like on a screen half the size, and i don't think apple will ditch the iPod functionality unless they're willing to ditch everything else because a processor that can run OSX is certainly powerful enough to decode MP3s and fetch some emails. maybe a wifi-less version?<br><br>imo, a stripped down iPhone would be nothing more than something that can make calls with a touch screen interface, and i don't think even apple could get away with charging a premium for that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ScotteusMaximus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2007 9:22PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/</guid><description><![CDATA[Still doesn't make any sense having a nano version of the iPhone considering the fact tht its 4 gb and 8 gb only. As it is, the manufacturing cost is less than $250 anyways. Wat Apple needs to do is go out and return 300 dollars to all the current owners and start selling the phone for 300!<br><br>Whenever Apple releases a slider phone (while keeping the gorgeous 3.5 inch screen intact) I'll buy one!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dhanik]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 10th 2007 7:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder if it'll play World of Warcraft....<br><br> <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFZA6gRK4qs" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFZA6gRK4qs</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yessir]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 10th 2007 7:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/</guid><description><![CDATA[Make a cdma version and stop the "exclusive" phone contracts.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PakieMak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 10th 2007 8:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/</guid><description><![CDATA[uhh no, cdma sucks dude]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bob the builder]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 10th 2007 4:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hated them for years but time to face the facts, Apple is Killing it.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[landmammal]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 10th 2007 4:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/09/iphone-nano-rumors-heating-up-destined-for-q4/</guid><description><![CDATA[Apple and AT&T are in contract together till 2010 or later so any phone that apple makes will only work on AT&T service sorry for all you CDMA users]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[zack croyle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 22nd 2007 4:39AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>