<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/06/lgs-vx8550-gets-inspected-reviewed/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/06/lgs-vx8550-gets-inspected-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/06/lgs-vx8550-gets-inspected-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Despite the fact that "the overall vibe was definitely positive", they gave it a 6.1 rating. Then again, it's fairly rare to see a well rated phone from Verizon. Most users I know would switch providers if the signal wasn't a problem. It's still pretty though.<br><br>Actually, now, AT&T in NYC area has gotten a lot better. My co-worker has Verizon and I have AT&T and we do on-site work together. Now most of the times, I'm lending him my phone because he doesn't have signal. Go figure.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ShortFuse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2007 12:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/06/lgs-vx8550-gets-inspected-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/06/lgs-vx8550-gets-inspected-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[A 6.1 ain't too bad on that site. And you're wrong about "Then again, it's fairly rare to see a well rated phone from Verizon." The Maxx Ve, and the enV, and the SCH-A990 were all rated excellent. <br><br>And they only game Sprint's UpStage a 5.6 however.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[elgee02]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2007 2:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/06/lgs-vx8550-gets-inspected-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/06/lgs-vx8550-gets-inspected-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, only 1 phones ranked a 9 or higher (the a990). The enV got a 7.6 and the maxx got a 7.5. Those aren't great scores; considering those are best Verizon has to offer. 3 phones rated 7.5 and above. The average is 5.5-6.5. <br><br>I said it, it's rare for find a well rated phone from Verizon. Thank you for emphasizing my point. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ShortFuse]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2007 6:13PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/06/lgs-vx8550-gets-inspected-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/06/lgs-vx8550-gets-inspected-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[If the average is 5.6-6.5, then tell me what carrier has the best phone arena rated phones eh?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[elgee02]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2007 10:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/06/lgs-vx8550-gets-inspected-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/06/lgs-vx8550-gets-inspected-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[You have to realize that when the A990 came out, it was the only phone to have an Autofocus Camera and a QVGA display.<br>If the A990 came out now (a year later) it would be scored lower, since there are more phones that have similar features.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[FAUguy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 6th 2007 7:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/06/lgs-vx8550-gets-inspected-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/06/lgs-vx8550-gets-inspected-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[um... reviewing ANY phone a year later would give it a lower score.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TheStone41]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2007 3:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/06/lgs-vx8550-gets-inspected-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/06/lgs-vx8550-gets-inspected-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just got this yesterday - I like it, what an upgrade from my VX6100.  I really like the vibration feedback on the touch buttons, and the scroll/click wheel is pretty slick too.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Enrique]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 10th 2007 10:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/06/lgs-vx8550-gets-inspected-reviewed/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/07/06/lgs-vx8550-gets-inspected-reviewed/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've had the chocolate vx8550 for almost a month.  I cannot find a decent cover for it and it's difficult to locate a wireless bluetooth device that doesn't look like a meteor on the side of your head.  The phone is ALL digital so, sending receiving text and picture messages are great...if you're in an area that has THAT coverage.  VCAST doesn't work unless you are in an area that has that coverage.  Surfing the internet with the phone is a joke!  It only gives internet in text unless you opt for the pricier plans.  I am disappointed with the performance of the phone.  TOO MUCH HYPE and it DOES NOT perform according to the hype.  Dissapointed.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kandy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 26th 2007 3:54PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>