Until just very recently, the terms "smartphone" and "fashion" seemed doomed to travel very different paths, never to intersect -- not in a product consumers could actually get their hands on, at least. As carriers and customers demand that their mobile companions become ever more featureful, though, the line separating high-end dumbphones and full-out smartphones bends, then bends some more, then finally breaks, leaving a clear-cut market for ultra-stylish open platform devices in its wake. There will always be buyers ready and waiting for handsets like the RAZR 2 and the Shine, but when Joe and Jane Businessperson are looking to open Word documents by day and get noticed in the bar by night, something's gotta give.
Enter the N76, Nokia's first truly fashion-friendly "multimedia computer" (to use its own terminology). Though Nokia's never shied away from trying unusual, different, and daring designs in its volume handsets, its S60 lineup has typically been left buttoned up. To be fair, features like 5 megapixel cameras, giant screens, and WiFi -- all frequent flyers on the Nseries -- don't lend themselves to svelte, gorgeous shells, but you don't necessarily need any of that to make a decent smartphone that can do double duty as face candy and as a professional sidekick.
In light of that impetus, think of the N76 as Nokia's way of saying, "yep, we hear you, and we're trying." It's far from perfect, but it's a noble first effort and we think a really promising indicator of things to come out of the company. On the plus side, the N76 is thin (by far the thinnest S60 flip ever), it's available in two colors that never really go out of style, and it's clad in mirrored accents that arguably give it a classy touch. On the downside, the fit and finish necessary to really pull off this kind of look isn't there, we imagine simply because Nokia isn't used to making phones that look and feel like this. In particular, the etched metal keypad was a bit wonky -- pressing keys in the 7-8-9 row frequently yielded characters from the *-0-# row. We eventually figured out that we could guarantee a good press by pressing the very tops of the 7, 8, and 9 keys with just our fingernails, but it was an annoyance we're not sure we'd want to deal with in a full-time phone.
Other details befitting a true fashion phone weren't quite there, either. For example, we were provided with the red model but the USB port cover and power button were both black, making them look a little out of place. Also, the battery cover and SIM slot among the strangest we've ever seen; both require a fairly delicate touch to engage correctly without damaging the surrounds.
Out front, anyone already familiar with the N75 will feel right at home with an identical display (large, bright, and colorful, may we add) and music controls that double as soft keys for basic navigation operations without having to open the flip. When the backlight's off, this secondary display becomes invisible underneath the mirrored cover -- cool, yes, but we'd occasionally find that the backlight wouldn't power on, forcing us to either squint and position the phone at an odd angle to make out the display or give in and open the flip. We suspect it's a software bug of some sort; cycling the phone's power fixed the problem every time.
Speaking of software, the N76's is pretty much what you'd expect to find on any modern S60 3rd Edition Feature Pack 1 handset, and with it, you get all the same benefits and pitfalls. The browser is truly world-class (but its usefulness is tempered slightly by the lack of American 3G) and Quickoffice comes preinstalled. We perceived the N76 to be very slightly quicker opening apps and navigating around than the N75 was, though we'd say the difference is negligible.
Add in the lack of WiFi and the lackluster fixed-focus 2 megapixel camera and we'd say Nokia made some tough compromises to pack all that S60 action into a razor (and RAZR) thin shell. For some, that compromise is going to be worth it, even at the unit's stiff $500 sticker. For everyone else, the N76 hopefully serves as an encouraging glimpse into the next generation of Nseries superphones -- a glimpse that is better left admired from afar.
Didn't take more than 3-4yrs to Nokia to copy Motorola Razr ;) Now they need to copy iPohone - another 3-4yrs + this time they need to copy also the software. Some 6yrs and Nokia will have their own iPhone copy which costs 10times the original, like n76 here =)
I wouldn't exactly say that Nokia copied Motorola's RAZR because while the n76 is RAZR THIN, at the time that it was released (late 2006/early 2007) this thing had better specs than whatever current RAZR was out there (I don't think that there's any RAZR out there that is a smartphone. Sure there's the Motorola Q, but that stands on its own and it's definitely not a RAZR). Although personally I wouldn't pay $500 for the n76, even if it is a smartphone. They could have added in WiFi and a better camera and maybe that sticker price wouldn't look so bad. Spec-wise, I don't think that the n76 is as good as any of the more recent Nokia n-series.
P.S. I don't know if you meant by looks or specs, but if it's specs, Nokia doesn't have to copy the iPhone because they already have cell phones that have either a 4GB hard drive, a better camera (more than 2 megapixels), even a better video (some take videos at 30 frames per second which is near DVD-quality). They can probably improve the look of their phones more (and work on making them even thinner). Sure Nokia doesn't have any touchscreen phones (at least not yet) but it's not like Apple invented touchscreens (well, except for maybe their multi-touch thing).
It's basicly the first phone from Nokia that meets the slimness of Razr, they have been telling for years that it's coming and now it's out with this. Couple years behind Razor. Pricetags of these nokia phones are ridicilous, it's even more in euros than dollars. Sure nokia has phones with nice technical specs like n95, but the product itself doesn't match the advertising material. There is no usability or design in Nokia phones and that's where the iPhone raises the bar.
this is how moto has got by with releasing the same phone with different colors to americans for couple of years, by people thinking it's a new phone because it looks slightly different(even if it's just a different color).
it's a thin flip, razr is a thin flip - sure. but nothing like the razr tech wise.
You guys seem to forget that these prices are buying them unlocked, not subsidized by the carrier. Yes, it's expensive, but that's the price for getting them without contracts and limitations. Any other smartphone is in the same price range.
The iPhone is definitely revolutionary in being a phone that's still expensive while being on a contract!
Its a bit harsh say that Nokia dont have desing, taste and usability etc etc. Thought this phone is going to flop no guestion about it thought havent this phone been out for some time already? Always hated flips had Nokia 6262...it was so horrible I mean realy horrible went away from Nokia product for a year, but they are doing just now as good as ever.
Example 6500 classic and slide are superb( Will have that 6500 classic on my hands anytime!)http://www.nokia6500series.com/ . Nokia was the one at the start who was famous on its easy to use they have losted a bit on that department after time have pasted sadly. I have no probs s60 or s40 deviced because I have always used them as most Europeans.
Looks nice and functional. Probably more than the average housewife needs in an cellphone. The cost seems a bit high, but I guess they had to cram an awful lot of stuff in it while keeping it thin. At least someone understands that compromises have to made and that no cellphone is gonna be perfect in size, function and price.
This ends up being off topic, but since everyone else is talking iPhone. It seems that everyone has forgotten the two Nokia touch screen products that were out, Nokia 7710 which launched in 2004, and Nokia 7700 which launched in 2003.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
BFish @ Jul 2nd 2007 12:44PM
Didn't take more than 3-4yrs to Nokia to copy Motorola Razr ;)
Now they need to copy iPohone - another 3-4yrs + this time they need
to copy also the software. Some 6yrs and Nokia will have their own
iPhone copy which costs 10times the original, like n76 here =)
db @ Jul 2nd 2007 2:09PM
I wouldn't exactly say that Nokia copied Motorola's RAZR because while the n76 is RAZR THIN, at the time that it was released (late 2006/early 2007) this thing had better specs than whatever current RAZR was out there (I don't think that there's any RAZR out there that is a smartphone. Sure there's the Motorola Q, but that stands on its own and it's definitely not a RAZR). Although personally I wouldn't pay $500 for the n76, even if it is a smartphone. They could have added in WiFi and a better camera and maybe that sticker price wouldn't look so bad. Spec-wise, I don't think that the n76 is as good as any of the more recent Nokia n-series.
P.S. I don't know if you meant by looks or specs, but if it's specs, Nokia doesn't have to copy the iPhone because they already have cell phones that have either a 4GB hard drive, a better camera (more than 2 megapixels), even a better video (some take videos at 30 frames per second which is near DVD-quality). They can probably improve the look of their phones more (and work on making them even thinner). Sure Nokia doesn't have any touchscreen phones (at least not yet) but it's not like Apple invented touchscreens (well, except for maybe their multi-touch thing).
BFish @ Jul 2nd 2007 3:07PM
@db
It's basicly the first phone from Nokia that meets the slimness of Razr,
they have been telling for years that it's coming and now it's out with this.
Couple years behind Razor. Pricetags of these nokia phones are ridicilous, it's even
more in euros than dollars. Sure nokia has phones with nice technical specs like n95, but
the product itself doesn't match the advertising material. There is no usability or design
in Nokia phones and that's where the iPhone raises the bar.
lassi @ Jul 3rd 2007 7:43AM
this is how moto has got by with releasing the same phone with different colors to americans for couple of years, by people thinking it's a new phone because it looks slightly different(even if it's just a different color).
it's a thin flip, razr is a thin flip - sure. but nothing like the razr tech wise.
or does razr have a webkit based browser?
carcomptoy @ Jul 2nd 2007 5:27PM
You guys seem to forget that these prices are buying them unlocked, not subsidized by the carrier. Yes, it's expensive, but that's the price for getting them without contracts and limitations. Any other smartphone is in the same price range.
The iPhone is definitely revolutionary in being a phone that's still expensive while being on a contract!
Eric @ Jul 2nd 2007 5:48PM
Is it me or does it look just like a Razr2.
topp @ Jul 2nd 2007 6:33PM
Its a bit harsh say that Nokia dont have desing, taste and usability
etc etc. Thought this phone is going to flop no guestion about it
thought havent this phone been out for some time already? Always
hated flips had Nokia 6262...it was so horrible I mean realy horrible
went away from Nokia product for a year, but they are doing just now
as good as ever.
Example 6500 classic and slide are superb( Will have
that 6500 classic on my hands anytime!)http://www.nokia6500series.com/ . Nokia was the one at the
start who was famous on its easy to use they have losted a bit on
that department after time have pasted sadly. I have no probs s60 or
s40 deviced because I have always used them as most Europeans.
Apple might have some advances actualy coming as new comer to market with
that interface it realy is fresh looking. Best thing that would
happen would be that when iphone get released in europe and nokia
would release Aeon.
http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/10/08/nokias-aeon-full-surface-screen-cellphone-concept/
Constable Odo @ Jul 3rd 2007 12:39PM
Looks nice and functional. Probably more than the average housewife needs in an cellphone. The cost seems a bit high, but I guess they had to cram an awful lot of stuff in it while keeping it thin. At least someone understands that compromises have to made and that no cellphone is gonna be perfect in size, function and price.
TheAgencyOne @ Jul 13th 2007 5:41PM
This ends up being off topic, but since everyone else is talking iPhone. It seems that everyone has forgotten the two Nokia touch screen products that were out, Nokia 7710 which launched in 2004, and Nokia 7700 which launched in 2003.