quickly approaches, we thought only a retrospective detailing some of the highlights -- and lowlights -- to come out of the always-colorful knockoff industry could encapsulate this whole new level of buzz the iPhone has brought to the mobile industry. Love 'em or hate 'em, credit has to be given to these guys for busting out an endless array of not-quite-iPhones in mere weeks after the world finally got a look at
.
As it turns out, there are just so many real iPhone knockoffs we had to skip over most pre-iPhone photoshops / mockups, as well as those ubiquitous iPhone skins; if imitation is indeed the sincerest form of flattery, the clownfish on the iPhone's wallpaper should be turning from orange to bright red right about now. Let's get started, shall we?
It's pretty rare -- nay, unprecedented -- for a phone to be so hotly anticipated that the knockoff industry is in full swing before the real thing's existence is even confirmed. This little gem
showed up on our radar last December, looking like some sort of brokedown
iPod mini prototype (that's pre-
iPod nano for the kiddies out there). The so-called "I-MOBILE i-phone" features a tiny 1.8 inch touchscreen with handwriting recognition (i-phone 1, iPhone 0!) and a 2 megapixel camera, but the GSM 900 / 1800 radio leaves us wanting. We're glad we held out for the real deal.
Mere days before Apple's announcement we spotted
this one. Reader reaction was actually quite positive -- and hey, what's there not to like? The screen's big, it appears to faithfully rip the iPod nano's styling, and with both Apple
and Windows keys, you can think of this phone as the Switzerland of the tech world.
January 9, 2007;
you know the rest. Tens upon tens of Chinese manufacturers set to work at producing The Next Insanely Great Knockoff. Boom.
It seems the knockoffs didn't come quite fast enough for some impatient souls.
This, folks, is what you call desperation. Desperation to feel the joy of unwrapping years of Apple's deepest secrets; some might say desperation for human affection. We'll let you be the judge.
The fakes got worse before they got better. Though we saw
this one in March, we suspect R&D (all eighteen hours of it) kicked off before Apple's announcement since there's absolutely zero resemblance to the real thing. In fact, we'd venture to say we see a little Sony Ericsson inspiration in the nav key layout. The makers undoubtedly walked away lawsuit-free on account of the modified Apple logo that looks only vaguely like the original.
Perhaps the company most brazenly and openly mimicking the iPhone's industrial design, Meizu appears to have every intention of going global with its miniOne line. After making a
series of
mid-course corrections (an effort to minimize attention from Apple, we'd wager), the miniOne M8 and M8 w could make a serious splash in the high-end market with a 667MHz core, 720 x 480 touchscreen, 3 megapixel cam, 3G data (on the M8 w model), and internal storage options ranging from 4GB to 16GB atop Windows Mobile 6. Is Meizu taking the Microsoft rivalry to Apple in a way that traditional current gen Windows Mobile devices can't? If all goes according to plan, we'll know before the year's out.
Deeda is an American company that swears up and down that its
"Pi" phone is completely original and that it started development long before the iPhone was announced. Even if that's true, we sure can't be blamed for noticing a few rather glaring similarities. The 3.6-inch WVGA touchscreen and impossibly thin looking shell should keep this one out of production for a while -- if Apple's legal juggernaut doesn't do the job first.
At a glance, the
CECT P168 (though we've heard the exact same device go by several names) may be the truest reproduction, and having made the rounds back in April in retail packaging, it's hard to not be impressed by the turnaround time. The software is
another matter altogether -- but if you want something you can whip out of your pocket, wave around quickly, and have at least a few folks in the vicinity think you're sporting an iPhone, this is probably your ticket. The microSD slot and touchscreen are cool, but multi-touch? Not so much.
iPhone mania's so pervasive that it
spread all the way to marooned crash survivors on some remote island. Come on, tell us you don't see some inspiration here.
You may not like the iPhone's lack of a numeric keypad, but we don't think adding a nonstandard array of tiny buttons at the phone's bottom edge was the answer. Alas, the
CECT IP2000 came into existence around the same time as the aforementioned P168, sporting what appears to be the same bogus software and a fairly similar shell. Again, there's
obviously no similarity between the shiny logo on the rear and Apple's actual logo, so no harm, no foul! This one can actually be snagged over on
M8COOL; the 3 megapixel cam is nice, but the lack of any US GSM bands is a bit of a wet blanket on that dream.
Yet one more from CECT, the IP9300, which you can also apparently grab from
M8COOL. The innards appear to be identical to the IP2000 -- 3 megapixel cam, touchscreen, dual-band GSM radio. Like the real deal, CECT's wares lack 3G data, but these ones take another giant leap back in time by foregoing EDGE, too. (Hooray for 90s mobile data!) Our favorite part of the IP9300 might be the official-looking FCC certification and "2007 All Rights Reserved" -- right below the backwards Apple logo, of course.
Steve may not be ready to grace the world with an iPod that shares the iPhone's more notable attributes, but far be it from that to stop anyone else. ONDA and Ainol have thrown their hats into the phoneless-iPhone-clone ring with the
Honey VX858 and V2000, respectively. These guys are taking full advantage of the screen real estate, too, offering up game console emulators, support for pretty much every video format imaginable, and in the case of the VX858, some sort of dual-core processor. Phone calls, though? Consider this one set to ignore.
And there you have it, a wondrous look at the inner workings of the ever-industrious knockoff community. Maybe the best part about it, though, is that we've got a feeling that we've only scratched the surface. Does Apple need to worry about lost market share? Nah, we doubt it. Oh, and a word to the gadget cloners out there: don't change a thing.
So, are we forgetting any?
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
NiGhTmArE @ Jun 26th 2007 9:08AM
It's ashame that they are all clones, some of them are actually pretty nice (cheap, nice features).
Remove the fake apple branding and i wouldn't mind owning one!
Espinoza @ Jun 26th 2007 9:27PM
Problem is, the iPhone appeal lies in its software and its integration with hardware. It score high in looks but it is missing the point to think that that is an important reason to get one (or a knock-off).
ShaleX @ Jun 26th 2007 9:23AM
I think the funniest part is, I'd love to get an iPhone clone, simply as I don't feel like switching to Cingular. I think that's the iPhone's biggest problem, is being tied to one carrier.
periks @ Jun 28th 2007 8:02PM
True to that talking about a company that really sucks and is way to expensive for the low quality services it offers. Iphone is really nice But the only problem is Cingular.
james @ Apr 13th 2008 6:32PM
i have an IPhone Clone ... it has 2 simcard holders .. i am running T-Mobile Plus AT&T ... and i can switchback and forth to each server as i want .. i love this phone .. but i cant seem to download any movies tho:(
Jamar @ Jun 26th 2007 9:52AM
I'll take one- all the looks (and more features) of the iPhone with none of that nasty AT&T 2-year lock-in.
Especially the CECT P168- it says in Chinese "dual standby". That means dual-SIM and no switching, something that hasn't ever been done in other countries before. If a call comes on on a given card, it automatically switches to that card.
Oh, and the plus is that the phonebook can be saved to the microSD card- says so right on the box.
Jeff @ Jun 26th 2007 2:50PM
Big problem with almost ALL the CECT/Chinaphones... they only use dual-band 900/1800 radios. Given that tri-band is pretty much a given in almost every phone these days (if not quadband) I can only imagine that they're chewing up surplus dual-band radios OR they don't want 1900Mhz in there to preclude use in the US for some reason. Fortunately, my rockin YF718 Retrobrick (a heady HK$450, or just under $60) not only sports 1900Mhz, but also a complete rip of the SLVR L6 interface. No USB or data so I can't SEEM edit though. :(
Fred @ Jun 26th 2007 3:25PM
So now since we don't have enough iPhone stories we're just gonna move the ones from this morning to this afternoon?
Fred @ Jun 26th 2007 3:25PM
So now since we don't have enough iPhone stories we're just gonna move the ones from this morning to this afternoon?
Tom @ Jun 26th 2007 3:28PM
And none of them compatible with Verizon =(
Alan Strangis @ Jun 26th 2007 3:36PM
Frankly, if the Meizu comes out fo realz, I'd pick it up in a heartbeat. I switched from Palm to Windows Mobile
1. because Palm refused to cram a cellphone into a TX (which the losers could have done 2 years ago instead of working on the damned Foleo).
2. after an extended play with WM5, it gave me no problems (HTC Wizard).
3. after using Opera (on the much faster Hermes), I was blown away by YouTube video loading and playing IN the browser. (of course that broke last week when YouTube made some changes - probably FOR the iPhone - but I'm sure flash video will work again).
I realize that I probably COULD go keyboard free, as I'm not bad at banging out SMS with Transcriber or the virtual keyboard (depending on my mood), and I'd LOVE more screen real estate, since I watch a fair number of video podcasts on my commute.
The saddest part about the iPhone is it just shows that the folks at Palm should have been paying attention to all the disenfranchised Clie fans when Sony left the game.
Mr Corsini @ Jun 26th 2007 4:37PM
I personally would not include the meizu m8 as an 'iclone'. Firstly meizu had plans and designs in place prior to the iphone announcment. Secondly the only similarity with the iphone and the m8 is it's visual appearence. The similiraties stop there. The meizu specification is far higher than the iphone and based on WINDOWS CE 6.0 (Not Windows mobile 5). The other devices listed as 'iclones' are all cheap chinese knock offs with sub standard operating systems. Meizu puts a lot of money and resources in to product research and development. If you include the meizu m8 then you should include the LG prada phone, would you be including the m8 if it had released at the same time as the prada phone? The only new (to cell phone anyway) features the iphone utilizes is multitouch and visual voicemail. Take these 2 features away and you have a middle of the road phone, with a pleasent looking and easy to use interface.
Mr Corsini @ Jun 26th 2007 4:39PM
I personally would not include the meizu m8 as an 'iclone'. Firstly meizu had plans and designs in place prior to the iphone announcment. Secondly the only similarity with the iphone and the m8 is it's visual appearence. The similiraties stop there. The meizu specification is far higher than the iphone and based on WINDOWS CE 6.0 (Not Windows mobile 5). The other devices listed as 'iclones' are all cheap chinese knock offs with sub standard operating systems. Meizu puts a lot of money and resources in to product research and development. If you include the meizu m8 then you should include the LG prada phone, would you be including the m8 if it had released at the same time as the prada phone? The only new (to cell phone anyway) features the iphone utilizes is multitouch and visual voicemail. Take these 2 features away and you have a middle of the road phone, with a pleasent looking and easy to use interface.
Lotharia @ Jun 26th 2007 9:12PM
I called Verizon today to ask them the cost of early termination on my contract ($125 per line) and they asked me, "Why would you want to termiinate?"
I told them I wanted to get an iPhone.... The guy said to me, "Well, we have comparable phones."
My reply was, "Oh no, you don't." :-)
bftsplx @ Jun 27th 2007 10:36AM
yeah, you forgot the Dell Axim X50V! Oh wait, that's a PDA that was introduced long before the iPhone! Too bad Dell never got the Axim right on the details (including an actual functional Internet application, plus decent music software).
zack vigneron @ Jun 27th 2007 11:32PM
love or hate it, someone's doing VERY well for himself. http://www.huckstr.com/spoofs/apple-money-machine.html
Patrick @ Jun 29th 2007 5:08PM
Who needs an iPhone?
I want a Sensicast-Tranzeo 3000 that I saw on the WIRED site today:
http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/15-07/local
Now datz what I'm talkin about.
patty @ Jul 4th 2007 7:56PM
i saw that first one in miami.
The guy told me 1010% that it wasnt fake. Well i didnt belive him. HAHA
derX @ Jul 9th 2007 2:06AM
Dude, how could anyone *ever* forget about this one?
http://blogs.pcworld.com/techlog/archives/iPhone.jpg
banky @ Aug 18th 2007 6:28PM
men i really feel u people you are dem trin can i be ur distributor here in nigeria. pls reply
disagree @ Oct 26th 2007 1:35PM
How could the author of this article include Meizu as iPhone clone?? He got the fact upside down!!!
Meizu has been on the market for 4-5 years now, if not longer. When did Apple announced their iPhone? less than 2 years!!
If anything, iPhone has been cloning other touch panel Mp4 players or Motorola and LG and Samsung touch screen smart phones!!
Meizu should sue the author of this article!
iPod touch owner @ Feb 6th 2008 7:24PM
Those clones don't really look like the original. The graphics may look the same or may even have the same copied bitmaps, but it seems that the fakers can't make the transitions between views very nicely. Why? They don't use the proper toolkit or are incapable of doing that with e.g. OpenGL. E.g. in the video, the only transition seen was the transition to main menu. Everything else was like it would be done with just some traditional 2D toolkit (despite there are open source toolkits being developed that could do those things for real, like the clutter toolkit from Opened Hand, maybe for the fakers it doesn't matter). Anyhow, in my opinion, faking something really innovative is lame and it would be better business to do some real products instead of copy-products, however, on the other hand, if the company that produces this kind of fakes would have some innovation, they would not be listed on this particular topic...
steven.butler @ Apr 2nd 2008 10:35AM
DONT BE FOOLED BY THESE "CLONES" THEY SUCK. I BOUGHT ONE AND AFTER JUST TWO WEEKS OF HAVING IT I SOLD IT AND BOUGHT A REAL IPHONE. THE "CLONES" OPERATE NOTHING LIKE THE IPHONE. THE SCREEN LOOKS LIKE IT WAS THE FIRST COLOR SCREEN EVER MADE FOR A PHONE. THE D800i I BOUGHT IS AN ABSOLUTE PIECE OF CRAP, IT IS CONSTANTLY FREEZING, DROPPING CALLS, SHUTTING OFF ON ITS OWN, AND IT ALSO CAN'T DO ANYTHING COOL. DONT WASTE YOUR TIME OR MONEY WITH THESE CHEAP PHONES. SAVE YOUR MONEY AND BUY THE REAL THING!