<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Battle of the 3+ megapixel cameraphones</title>
<link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/05/16/battle-of-the-3-megapixel-cameraphones/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Battle of the 3+ megapixel cameraphones</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Battle of the 3+ megapixel cameraphones]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/05/16/battle-of-the-3-megapixel-cameraphones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/05/16/battle-of-the-3-megapixel-cameraphones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Too bad they didn't include the i-Mobile 902... It's an average phone, but the camera - it's just fantastic!<br><br><a href="http://tnkgrl.wordpress.com/2007/02/08/i-mobile-902-first-impressions/" rel="nofollow">http://tnkgrl.wordpress.com/2007/02/08/i-mobile-902-first-impressions/</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tnkgrl]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2007 2:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Battle of the 3+ megapixel cameraphones]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/05/16/battle-of-the-3-megapixel-cameraphones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/05/16/battle-of-the-3-megapixel-cameraphones/</guid><description><![CDATA[At scanR, we check the sharpness of each image that people send to scanR and publish the aggregated results at www.CheckMyCameraPhone.com. Currently, the RAZR maxx and KDDI W41H lead the pack with the Nokia N95 and Sony Ericsson K790/800/810 right behind.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[scanR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2007 10:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Battle of the 3+ megapixel cameraphones]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/05/16/battle-of-the-3-megapixel-cameraphones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/05/16/battle-of-the-3-megapixel-cameraphones/</guid><description><![CDATA[Here is the link: <br><br><a href="http://www.CheckMyCameraPhone.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.CheckMyCameraPhone.com/</a><br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[scanR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2007 10:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Battle of the 3+ megapixel cameraphones]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/05/16/battle-of-the-3-megapixel-cameraphones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/05/16/battle-of-the-3-megapixel-cameraphones/</guid><description><![CDATA[scanR, I don't mean to be rude but your post/self-promotion has nothing to do with that this post is about. It confuses people (like me) into thinking that your website honestly reviews the photograph quality of camera phones when really all it does is RATE HOW GOOD YOUR PHONE IS FOR SCANNING USING SCANR. Very misleading. At least re-phrase it better the next time you plug-in your website in a post.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[db]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2007 4:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Battle of the 3+ megapixel cameraphones]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/05/16/battle-of-the-3-megapixel-cameraphones/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/05/16/battle-of-the-3-megapixel-cameraphones/</guid><description><![CDATA[They forgot Sharp 903 in that line up... That's the phone to beat in my opinion. It's been out since 2005 and it can produce digicam quality from its lens.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rommel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 17th 2007 7:30PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>