It may not be the
world's smallest anymore, but make no mistake, folks: Motorola's Miniblue H9 is
really small. Of course, manufacturers have pretty much perfected the miniaturization of Bluetooth circuitry to the point that headset design has been more a question of aesthetic design for some time now -- so is smaller necessarily better when it comes to these suckers?
Some may remember the H9 better as the
H5, the alias it'd been given when Moto teased us with it the first time around over a year ago. Nothing seems to have changed other than the name, which is just fine by us -- the original looked good, and more importantly, it was microscopic which seems to be the angle they're going for here.
No documentation was provided with the unit we had, but as with all Bluetooth headsets, the controls are pretty dead simple: a large, multifunction button on the headset's face along with two volume controls on either side. The multifunction button was a bit too "clicky" for our liking, but we'll hold final judgment for when we get our hands on a production example.
We had no trouble pairing the H9 and sound quality was fine on both ends, though the included bud was far too large to properly fit into our ears. This caused two problems. First, the thing stuck way too far out from the side of our face, making us look silly -- quite the opposite effect of purchasing such a diminutive headset. Second, it had a tendency to slip out of our ear. Bear in mind, here, that the only thing holding it in is the grip it has on the sides of your ear canal, so a properly fitted bud is crucial. We're assuming the production model will include a variety of sizes to fit ears big and small.
Possibly the coolest part of the H9 was not the headset itself, but its charging base. The thing is seriously built like a tank. It's heavy, and we couldn't really figure out what made it that way. Circuitry? Solid plastic? Lead weights? Who knows, but needless to say, it's not tipping over if you don't want it to. The H9 fits snugly up top with rubber guides to make sure the sensitive bits don't get roughed up.
Production H9s should be hitting the streets before too long, and assuming Motorola doesn't price itself out of the market, this one could be a winner -- just as long as we get some buds that fit. Y'hear, Moto?
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
teodoro @ Mar 2nd 2007 9:51AM
Don't know if this site is legit, but shows list price @ $199 although the sale price is $119. (It is out of stock at the moment) :-)
http://www.anything4wireless.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=915
steve @ Nov 8th 2007 10:31PM
hi guys any body ccan give the code for the h9 cause i lost mine thank's
spinedoc @ Mar 2nd 2007 10:11AM
You guys state in your "review" that the H9 is unchanged from the H5. From what I have read they removed the feature of the H5 which picked up voice from the ear canal and just put in a plain microphone with dsp into the H9.
This is a pretty HUGE fact to have missed in the review. Can anyone confirm or deny this? It was a great headset when it had the ear canal feature, but now it seems like it's just a plain headset.
fincher @ Mar 2nd 2007 11:04AM
Confirmed. That is the big difference between the H9 and H5.
Dave H @ Mar 2nd 2007 12:59PM
How about a picture of it in someone's ear?
That would be helpful and most relevant.
Just make sure it's a clean ear.
David @ Mar 2nd 2007 1:16PM
This site has the H5, or so they claim for $99:
http://myworldphone.com/motorolah5.htm
David @ Mar 2nd 2007 1:22PM
This site has what they claim to be the H5 for $99US: http://myworldphone.com/motorolah5.htm
beq @ Mar 2nd 2007 4:12PM
I was interested in the upcoming Gennum nx6000:
http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/08/gennums-nx6000-noise-cancelling-blueooth-headset-now-with-more/
The Motorola H9 looks smaller, but will it be as good in the DSP noise reduction department? Which will be available first?
More photos:
nx6000
http://aving.net/usa/news/default.asp?mode=read&c_num=33566&C_Code=01&mn_name=news
H9
http://aving.net/usa/news/default.asp?mode=read&c_num=33149&C_Code=01&mn_name=news
clayton @ Mar 2nd 2007 10:30PM
I've had the H-5 for a few months now and I'm not impressed with it. Yes its small but it has some major draw backs. First, it needs to be wedged into your ear canal so far to keep it from falling out. This also makes having it in while your not in a call very uncomfortable. You lose about 50% of your hearing out of one ear. Also if your eating something the noise inside your head it very annoying. Second, it sticks so far out from the side of your head. I turned mine around backwards. It fits better this way, its more comfortable and it doesn't stick out as far. Third, the audio sucks! When I', in a call I have to keep the audio down low on my end due to it being in my ear canal and its so loud in there. But everyone I've called has told me it picks up way too much ambient noise. And fourth, I use a Razr V3M and when I have the two paired up I have to keep my Razr out of my pocket at all times so that it doesn't pick static up.
In closing, I'd say that over all its a good concept but it needs a lot of refinement. If I had to chose a good headset, I'd chose the Jarba bt250v.
Adam @ Mar 5th 2007 10:07AM
I don't think that or the Sagem H4 are smaller than the Nextlink 5G:
http://www.pocketnow.com/index.php?a=portal_detail&t=reviews&id=643
nutzareus @ Mar 6th 2007 5:43PM
C'mon you know you wanna look like Lt. Uhura with that thing sticking out of your ear... :-)
Seriously, I thought this was supposed to have the jawbone technology where it's supposed to use your own skull's vocal resonance to transmit your voice to reduce noise and interference?
Inndesign @ Oct 23rd 2007 5:05PM
Thats the Aliph Jawbone Bluetooth Wireless Headset with Noise Shield. I have yet to buy one Bluetooth headset that had both good audio and voice. For me, nothing beats the Plantronics M175C headset. No, it's not wireless, but it does have superior sound for the user and the reciever. It can be worn all day will little notice and it will last for years.
kudzu_kid @ Nov 20th 2007 11:04PM
I've been using the H9 fairly intensely for the past 3 months or so.
In that time I've been through 4, now going on 5, charger bases (that black tube-like thing you park the H9 in to charge - you actually charge the charger!).
Just to lay the groundwork here, I'm a former senior service technician for a major service provider in to Fortune 100 corporations, former network engineer for a major telecom company, broadcast engineer for two 50KW radio stations, and a senior staff technologist for Bell Communications Researh (Bellcore - pre-merger), I think I am qualified to say there is a major design flaw with the H9 charger base. There are 4 extremely small / fine pins that make contact with circuit pads on the H9 while charging. Unfortunately, if you press the H9 in the charge at anything other than a PERFECT 0 degree angle, you'll most likley critically bend and/or snap off one or more of the pins. Why Motorola opted for using these "pins" instead of a ball-bearing contactor is beyond my comprehension. I usually equate Motorola with superior durability (fond recollections of their 2-way radios, repeaters, early cell phones, etc.). Absolutely not the case with this device. I bet they get a LOT of warranty returns for this problem. I can say without reservation, this is the weakest Motorola device I've ever personally owned. Can't believe I'm the only person that's experienced this.
Lisa @ Jul 15th 2008 3:18PM
I have the same problem with the pins bending. I'm looking for a way to replace the tube.