<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/14/will-the-iphone-support-exchange-direct-push/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/14/will-the-iphone-support-exchange-direct-push/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/14/will-the-iphone-support-exchange-direct-push/</guid><description><![CDATA[Interesting discussion. However; Exchange Activesync uses HTTPS thus port 443. This also means the client would use the Activesync software and needs to support SSL for encryption and authentication. So you're saying Apple would get a licensing agreement with Microsoft for this?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Maarten]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 15th 2007 3:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/14/will-the-iphone-support-exchange-direct-push/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/14/will-the-iphone-support-exchange-direct-push/</guid><description><![CDATA[To implement on the device and be legal they would have to acquire a license from Microsoft to do it.  Palm did so with on the Treo 650 for the prior version of Server Activesync, so it it feasible to think a vendor might do that again for DirectPush.  Unfortunately I haven't seen anyone else do it yet, so we have no point of reference for comparison.<br><br>As for the first responder here, it uses 80 *or* 443 depending on wether or not you are using SSL.  You also seem to be implying that they would need a license to authenticate with the Exchange server using SSL which just doesn't make any sense.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Green]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 15th 2007 7:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/14/will-the-iphone-support-exchange-direct-push/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/14/will-the-iphone-support-exchange-direct-push/</guid><description><![CDATA[DataViz offers software for devices to support ActiveSync (AirSync), direct push, etc.  I could see them offering a port for the iPhone.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ethan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 15th 2007 4:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/14/will-the-iphone-support-exchange-direct-push/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/14/will-the-iphone-support-exchange-direct-push/</guid><description><![CDATA[iPhone is available with Cingular ONLY!? And what if I am stuck under contract with a carrier OTHER than Cingular but still want a iPhone?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger Smith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 16th 2007 4:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/14/will-the-iphone-support-exchange-direct-push/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/14/will-the-iphone-support-exchange-direct-push/</guid><description><![CDATA["so it it feasible to think a vendor might do that again for DirectPush. Unfortunately I haven't seen anyone else do it yet, so we have no point of reference for comparison."<br><br>Nokia have <br><br>"mail for exchange" which is a symbian app for the e series of phones for direct push.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stern]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 16th 2007 6:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/14/will-the-iphone-support-exchange-direct-push/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/14/will-the-iphone-support-exchange-direct-push/</guid><description><![CDATA[Roger Smith:<br><br>Haha, Well that's just too bad for you! But I don't anyone is going to cry for you, so do it yourself somewhere else.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles Melbye]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 21st 2007 9:10AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/14/will-the-iphone-support-exchange-direct-push/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/14/will-the-iphone-support-exchange-direct-push/</guid><description><![CDATA[If the iPhone is available for sale at the Apple Store as an "unlocked" phone that you just add you GSM sim card to, then any GSM service will work. I knwo Verizon doesn't used sim cards so even if this is the case, you'd be SOL on some of the carriers.<br><br>It really depends what Apple is getting at with the whole "exclusive carrier" thing. Personally although i'm a cingular customer i really begrudge buying a product from them, i'd much prefer to buy elsewhere then just put my sim card into the device.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Robbie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2007 1:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/14/will-the-iphone-support-exchange-direct-push/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/14/will-the-iphone-support-exchange-direct-push/</guid><description><![CDATA[Steve Jobs already stated that the iPhone would only be available wiht a 2-year Cingular contract. It will not be sold unlocked at Apple Stores, at least not during Cingular's exclusive rights period, estimates of which range from 6 months to 5 years (probably more like 2 years).<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lbuschjr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 1st 2007 5:37PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>