Hmm... this all seems to be working very well for Apple. First, Cisco takes them to court over the "iPhone" name. Next, "Visual Voicemail"... Each time they have to go to court, there's an injunction so they can't sell the product in question. Each injunction means further delays concerning getting that thing to market. Each delay means more time for Apple to actually start building the thing. After all the cases are resolved, if Apple comes out the winner, they can counter-sue for lost profits because they couldn't sell the product. I know this is very fuzzy logic, but is it just me, or is there a grand scheme here?
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
-_- @ Jan 14th 2007 7:18PM
Hmm... this all seems to be working very well for Apple.
First, Cisco takes them to court over the "iPhone" name.
Next, "Visual Voicemail"...
Each time they have to go to court, there's an injunction so they can't sell the product in question.
Each injunction means further delays concerning getting that thing to market.
Each delay means more time for Apple to actually start building the thing.
After all the cases are resolved, if Apple comes out the winner, they can counter-sue for lost profits because they couldn't sell the product.
I know this is very fuzzy logic, but is it just me, or is there a grand scheme here?