Skip to Content
Wouldn't interoperability REDUCE differentiation, and therefore further blur the (necessary) IP distinction between the two products?One is a cell phone, the other is a VoIP phone. They're not competing products.Cisco has every right to protect the name, but I don't understand how this WASN'T about money.
Name
E-mail
E-mail:
Password
Remember Me
E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment
Add your comments:
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
jon @ Jan 11th 2007 1:18AM
Wouldn't interoperability REDUCE differentiation, and therefore further blur the (necessary) IP distinction between the two products?
One is a cell phone, the other is a VoIP phone. They're not competing products.
Cisco has every right to protect the name, but I don't understand how this WASN'T about money.