<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for BlackBerry 8800 in the wild</title>
<link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/04/blackberry-8800-in-the-wild/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for BlackBerry 8800 in the wild</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BlackBerry 8800 in the wild]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/04/blackberry-8800-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/04/blackberry-8800-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[OMG....OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Adnan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2007 7:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BlackBerry 8800 in the wild]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/04/blackberry-8800-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/04/blackberry-8800-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[If he identifies it as the "8900c" one would assume that's a Cingular model number based on the Blackberry name's of the past.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Green]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2007 7:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BlackBerry 8800 in the wild]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/04/blackberry-8800-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/04/blackberry-8800-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[Its not 3G so I won't be picking it up. Otherwise I would be all over it. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[maevro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2007 7:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BlackBerry 8800 in the wild]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/04/blackberry-8800-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/04/blackberry-8800-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[wheres the camera?<br>and the interface/theme is cingular so i guess the c really does mean the phone is for Cingular. I don't care as much about the 3G as I do about the camera. SureType is the only thing stopping me from gettin the Pearl. I guess my 8700c will have to do]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[spencer Katz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2007 9:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BlackBerry 8800 in the wild]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/04/blackberry-8800-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/04/blackberry-8800-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm no crackberry fan.  Call me WM5 or even Palm fanboy, but I'll give my 2 cents on the whole thing regarding phone thickness here since it<br>was brought up again. I think smartphones like the crackberry or WinMo and Palms out there have to have a certain amount of thickness in order to be comfortable.  I don't see how a thin phone would be<br>comfortable for typing or doing any of the many functions these smartphones afford us to.  Anybody agree?<br><br>BTW, I just tried a Blackberry Pearl and I didn't like it.  I didn't see what the big deal was.  Felt kind of delicate or cheap in the hand.  Like it wouldn't last for long.  Plus the typing program used was kind of lame.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[apeguero]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2007 10:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BlackBerry 8800 in the wild]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/04/blackberry-8800-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/04/blackberry-8800-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just an FYI the thread in howardforums has been deleted per request of the OP.  We apologize for any inconvenience.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[.7]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2007 10:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BlackBerry 8800 in the wild]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/04/blackberry-8800-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/04/blackberry-8800-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[well of course it was deleted...that picture was clearly taken in a former blue store as evidenced by the SIM card reader in the background and the faux wood linoleum...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[none]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 5th 2007 2:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on BlackBerry 8800 in the wild]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/04/blackberry-8800-in-the-wild/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2007/01/04/blackberry-8800-in-the-wild/</guid><description><![CDATA[To an extent, I agree, apeguero.  I have the 6700 and I get teased about it's size by my friends all the time, but I really don't mind it.  I find it very comfortable to hold while typing and when in a call.  So as long as I like it, I don't care what they think.<br><br>I've used the 8525, though, and do like it a bit more because it is just a tiny bit thinner.  Hopefully the 6800 will be thinner than the 6700, but not by much.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[flamer's grill]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 6th 2007 12:39PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>