<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Verizon to sell mobile ads; service still not free</title>
<link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/12/27/verizon-to-sell-mobile-ads-service-still-not-free/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Verizon to sell mobile ads; service still not free</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon to sell mobile ads; service still not free]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/12/27/verizon-to-sell-mobile-ads-service-still-not-free/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/12/27/verizon-to-sell-mobile-ads-service-still-not-free/</guid><description><![CDATA[operamini.com for the win.<br><br>why would ANYONE use a WAP browser when Opera mini compresses the data, removes ad banners, has content folding (!!!) and is far faster too, making an 80k WAP browsed site only 3k on Opera mini.... your cell phone bill will thank you.<br><br>posted using Opera mini,<br><br>.ed]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[.ed]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 27th 2006 10:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon to sell mobile ads; service still not free]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/12/27/verizon-to-sell-mobile-ads-service-still-not-free/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/12/27/verizon-to-sell-mobile-ads-service-still-not-free/</guid><description><![CDATA[here in the UK on vodafone, vodafone live wap site is always free to access, has news sport weather etc, and no ads]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[srw985]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 27th 2006 10:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon to sell mobile ads; service still not free]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/12/27/verizon-to-sell-mobile-ads-service-still-not-free/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/12/27/verizon-to-sell-mobile-ads-service-still-not-free/</guid><description><![CDATA[If this catches on with other services, I'm going to be dropping my high tech phone for one with a monochrome low res screen, so that these cant be shown.  Will be just phone and text for me, i get enough crap to look at on the pc.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gennaro]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 27th 2006 2:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon to sell mobile ads; service still not free]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/12/27/verizon-to-sell-mobile-ads-service-still-not-free/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/12/27/verizon-to-sell-mobile-ads-service-still-not-free/</guid><description><![CDATA[Up next, Verizon rapes, then spits, on its customers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[saq]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 27th 2006 2:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon to sell mobile ads; service still not free]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/12/27/verizon-to-sell-mobile-ads-service-still-not-free/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/12/27/verizon-to-sell-mobile-ads-service-still-not-free/</guid><description><![CDATA[I would be willing ot bet, Verizon (and others) will offer to charge you for a service that is FREE of ads. While, making money from advertizers when you do not. Since, they (the ads) will be right in your face. And, in essense, costing you money, in the long run, for more content DLed from your cell. Providing you arent on an unlimited plan for data.<br><br>Its miniscule, but if pictures acompany that text ad, things could ad up for verizon customers.<br><br>And this, folks, is why they suck.<br><br>PAY FOR NO ADS! Its genius. Its like paying to be anonymous in the phone book.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PEZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 27th 2006 7:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon to sell mobile ads; service still not free]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/12/27/verizon-to-sell-mobile-ads-service-still-not-free/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/12/27/verizon-to-sell-mobile-ads-service-still-not-free/</guid><description><![CDATA[saq: nice eFront reference.  We're not too far away from that happening.<br><br>PEZ: Verizon is basically charging you to view ads, since you're using up minutes and paying whatever per-kilobyte rate they charge (is it $.002 or .002 cents per kilobyte? Hmmm...).  Verizon receives data fees, charges for minutes if there's an overage, AND earns ad revenue.  Brilliant!<br><br>I've decided to stop waiting for the end of term and have T-mobile send Verizon an FCC number porting request.  They've pushed on us the VCast spamvertising, the Borg UI, the lack of Bluetooth, the Get It Now! media lock-in, and their sad lineup of yesteryear phones.  Let's see how many subscribers VZW loses to this boneheaded money-grab.<br><br>"Advertising is the rattling of a stick inside a swill bucket." -- George Orwell]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[a_n]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 27th 2006 8:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon to sell mobile ads; service still not free]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/12/27/verizon-to-sell-mobile-ads-service-still-not-free/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/12/27/verizon-to-sell-mobile-ads-service-still-not-free/</guid><description><![CDATA[OK OK I'll post more info on this later. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HTC Kid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2006 4:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon to sell mobile ads; service still not free]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/12/27/verizon-to-sell-mobile-ads-service-still-not-free/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/12/27/verizon-to-sell-mobile-ads-service-still-not-free/</guid><description><![CDATA[Phonescoop says Sprint has already been doing this. Looks like the "spitting and raping" is not exclusive to Verizon Wireless.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[elgee02]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2006 6:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Verizon to sell mobile ads; service still not free]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/12/27/verizon-to-sell-mobile-ads-service-still-not-free/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/12/27/verizon-to-sell-mobile-ads-service-still-not-free/</guid><description><![CDATA[According to Verizon, initially, the ads will only be on the mobile web 2.0 service, not on vcast, or vcast music.  During the rollout, the ads will only be on 3rd party pages like the ESPN or Maxim online pages.  Customers will not be able to opt out, but "As with advertising in other media - TV commercials, newspaper ads, billboards, radio spots - customers can choose to skip right over them."<br><br>Also, as this is a trial, customer reactions and feedback will be closely monitored.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 28th 2006 7:34PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>