<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Motorola Q Pro in the wild, this time it's for Verizon Wireless</title>
<link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Motorola Q Pro in the wild, this time it's for Verizon Wireless</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola Q Pro in the wild, this time it's for Verizon Wireless]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</guid><description><![CDATA[is it coming to Sprint? or does verizon still have exclusive rights?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 11th 2006 5:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola Q Pro in the wild, this time it's for Verizon Wireless]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's not a Q Pro you boneheads, it's a Q with black casing. Same hardware. Different color.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PSOmasterX77]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 11th 2006 5:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola Q Pro in the wild, this time it's for Verizon Wireless]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</guid><description><![CDATA[How about a screenshot of the device specs to clear up any [i]confusion[/i]. ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[backbeat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 11th 2006 6:01PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola Q Pro in the wild, this time it's for Verizon Wireless]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</guid><description><![CDATA[I love how almost every "in the wild" pre release picture of anything with a screen looks as if they just wiped it against someone's greasy forehead.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 11th 2006 6:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola Q Pro in the wild, this time it's for Verizon Wireless]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree  with PSOmaster (without the bonehead part). The pics you posted earlier of the Q Pro had a different button arrangement at the top of the keypad then this. This has the original Q layout. Go look at the pics of the "Norman" and then look at this. Different, end of story... unless the "Norman" mock up isn't the Q Pro...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dixonij]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 11th 2006 7:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola Q Pro in the wild, this time it's for Verizon Wireless]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</guid><description><![CDATA["That's not a Q Pro you boneheads, it's a Q with black casing. Same hardware. Different color."<br><br>I agree.  That's nothing more than a black Q.  The "Pro" you guys showed the other day is a completely different formfactor.  <br>What is engadget smokin'?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Camp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 11th 2006 7:30PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola Q Pro in the wild, this time it's for Verizon Wireless]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</guid><description><![CDATA[I doubt it's the Q Pro.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2006 6:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola Q Pro in the wild, this time it's for Verizon Wireless]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</guid><description><![CDATA[Any Q's Coming to Sprint?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 11th 2006 9:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola Q Pro in the wild, this time it's for Verizon Wireless]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just to clear up a few things.<br>1.  That is the Q Pro.<br>2.  All those pics were taken inside a Verizon store, I know this.  I have been behind those desks.<br>3.  The Q Pro will probably be available before the year end<br>4.  The "Norman" is an entirely different animal, notice the fact that it doesnt have a click wheel-the Q doesn't have a touch screen, why would Moto ever do that?<br>5.  The "Norman" is thick, the Q was always meant to be a PDA phone that beats the RIM's and the Treo's in portability.<br>6.  Freaking sweet!<br>JMD]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John MadDog]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 11th 2006 11:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola Q Pro in the wild, this time it's for Verizon Wireless]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</guid><description><![CDATA[Maddog just got neutered as Coorys00 (the source of the pics and info) has clarified that this is simply a Black-Q. Nothing more/nothing less. Muchado about very little.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[backbeat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2006 12:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola Q Pro in the wild, this time it's for Verizon Wireless]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</guid><description><![CDATA[Whatever the case, I am drooling over the Moto Q regardless.  I can upgrade in May using my Merits benefit with Verizon Wireless.  I am sure looking forward to getting my hands on one of those QPhones!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KSanchez]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 12th 2006 12:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola Q Pro in the wild, this time it's for Verizon Wireless]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</guid><description><![CDATA[will you be allowed to access aim/yahoo/ms messenger from it instantly]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[omar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 14th 2006 1:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola Q Pro in the wild, this time it's for Verizon Wireless]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</guid><description><![CDATA[Man, I knew this would happen... the minute I think about picking up a Q, the pics come out of the black one. What to do...what to do...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 13th 2006 5:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola Q Pro in the wild, this time it's for Verizon Wireless]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well black is nice for the Moto Q but honestly it really lacks quality. I should know I have plaid with it for some time and even before it was released and unless they made huge improvement to the internal design and quality of parts it’s a headache. This device design needs quality control to correct very poor battery life and usability. By far Blackberry has a solid design and ease of use. All others are just trying to mimic what has already been hailed the best in what it does. My fellow techies when Microsoft releases a newly designed user interface and integrated mobile office into the smart phone version of Windows Mobile OS then maybe we will have something worth buying. My recommendation is stick to Blackberry or buy a Palm that has the full blown Windows Mobile OS with Mobile Office integrated, you'll be much better off. This is just my opinion based on my experience in the industry.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Mace]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 15th 2006 5:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola Q Pro in the wild, this time it's for Verizon Wireless]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</guid><description><![CDATA[Overall the Q really aint that bad, but yes a Palm Treo 700p or w would be a better choice. What makes the Q so popular is it's low price amongst VZW PDA/Smartphones and it's slim size and style. I think the black looks pretty cool.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[elgee02]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2006 10:34AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola Q Pro in the wild, this time it's for Verizon Wireless]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/11/motorola-q-pro-in-the-wild-this-time-its-for-verizon-wireless/</guid><description><![CDATA[WHEN....??? IS THIS THING COMING TO VZW STORES IN CALI??]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ASHMILLION]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 5th 2006 1:14AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>