<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Palm sez NTP patents are invalid, refuses to settle</title>
<link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/07/palm-sez-ntp-patents-are-invalid-refuses-to-settle/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Palm sez NTP patents are invalid, refuses to settle</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm sez NTP patents are invalid, refuses to settle]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/07/palm-sez-ntp-patents-are-invalid-refuses-to-settle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/07/palm-sez-ntp-patents-are-invalid-refuses-to-settle/</guid><description><![CDATA[I hear that another company had a similar lawsuit a while ago. They also said that the patents were invalid. Turns out they were right. No -- wait! Actually turned out they paid millions to make the problem go away.<br><br>Gotta love the USA patent laws.<br><br>Pretty soon NTP will run out of profitable companies to attack.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MAS90Guru]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2006 5:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Palm sez NTP patents are invalid, refuses to settle]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/07/palm-sez-ntp-patents-are-invalid-refuses-to-settle/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/11/07/palm-sez-ntp-patents-are-invalid-refuses-to-settle/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you want to get technical, NTP has less than a quarter of a billion to "blow on legal fees" given that the $650M was awarded three ways to the two founders of NTP (or their respective widows) and the shareholders of the company - it would only be the latter group's money that could be used on new lawsuits.<br><br>That being said, when RIM paid them off, they received an unfettered license to the technology, which extends to the BlackBerry service running on other devices as well (eg: BBConnect on your Palm 650).  I don't even see how Palm can be in violation of their patents since Palm doesn't have their own push email system (or do they? I've never used one but always though you needed to get Good or Visto or something).<br><br>bah - whatever, I'll check back on this story in four years.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[badonkadonk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 8th 2006 1:35PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>