Nokia isn't stupid. Holding nothing more than a sliver of the huge pie that is the US smartphone market, it only took a few BlackBerrys (with the occasional Treo or Q thrown in here and there) for the world's largest cellphone manufacturer to realize that a QWERTY-style device might just be S60's key to acceptance among fickle American consumers. Of course, it took a good long while for it to get here
in an official capacity -- and along the way we've had to sit back and watch a
slightly more capable sibling drop in S60-friendly Europe -- but the
E62 is finally real for any average Joe willing to head down to their local Cingular shop and plunk down a reasonable amount of cash. WiFi or no, that's a refreshing change of pace for those of us used to getting our Symbian fix by paying through the nose for an import that may or may not work well on our carrier of choice. In practice, how does the business-oriented E62 fare in today's smartphone landscape? Are Americans ready for S60? For that matter, is S60 ready for Americans? Read on for our initial impressions.

First off, the E62 oozes business; you get that impression the moment you open the box without ever having turned it on. The device just has that straight-edge look, that Finnish style that only Nokia can pull off. For some, that's a negative, but for others (read: anyone looking for an understated smartphone that doesn't scream "I can play videos" or "I've got more memory than you do") this will come as a pleasant surprise. Sharp edges and a uniform color finish off the clean appearance, and thanks to some metal bits, the phone feels as good in the hand as it looks.
Speaking of feeling good, the controls on a device of this form factor categorically make or break it. A phone could rock 1GB of RAM, a 12-megapixel camera, and a teleporter, but without an effective means of typing the old-fashioned way, it's dead in our eyes. For the E62, we're happy to report that the results are mostly positive. The thumb stick is hands-down the best we've ever used in a phone; we actually
liked it, and that's saying a lot coming from a reviewer that prefers virtually any other method of directional control. The keypad was usable -- we weren't able to master it in the short time we spent with the phone, but we envision that we'd become proficient on it in a matter of a week or so. It positively spanks the keypads offered by the Q and the Samsung i320, thanks mainly to its uniform key shape / spacing and the softly domed tops. We found the space bar a bit lacking in width, and it would've been nice if Nokia had provisioned a couple more millimeters of height for the send, end, and soft keys, but none of those issues were deal breakers for us. The dedicated Messaging button and side keys were also welcome additions not found on your garden-variety Nseries device. The Messaging button is decidedly a nod to the phone's business user target demographic, but why can't we get some side keys on our
N80? Huh?
Turning the phone on, our attention is promptly drawn to the screen. In a word, it's gorgeous. Yes, we know, it's only QVGA, nothing to write home about -- especially considering that Nokia's got several phones kicking around with 416 x 352 resolution -- and perhaps we're just not used to seeing the S60 user interface on such a large, bright, crisp display. Nevertheless, color us impressed. Despite being found almost exclusively on portrait displays, S60 adapts easily to a landscape orientation; we couldn't find anything that looked odd or out of place from the change, and the home screen looked great. Our apologies for the embarrassingly poor image quality here; we think we're starting to understand why we get sent so many blurry, craptastic shots of unreleased gear.

S60 has come a long way from the days of the 3650 and 7650. It's more powerful, easier to use, and more visually appealing, particularly on the powerhouse Eseries and Nseries handsets. Even in its third generation, though, the platform has its fair share of quirks. One of the most painful is also one of the most easily solved: "out of memory" messages. These have plagued every galdarned Nokia smartphone we've ever used, the E62 sadly included. Nokia, please: we
implore you to put the proper amount of RAM in your phones. We'll gladly pay the extra $5 or $10. Granted, they typically only happen with moderate to intensive web browsing, but there's still no excuse to pack in less than 100MB of RAM in the year 2006.
That being said, the E62's productivity apps are sufficient and compare favorably to a Windows Mobile Smartphone like the Q. Switching apps can be a bit delayed at times with some waits as high as 2-3 seconds, but users coming from a Wizard (like the
Cingular 8125) -- or pretty much any smartphone, for that matter -- won't find the speed unbearable. We found S60 3rd Edition's layout and icons to be prettier than Windows Mobile 5 and about on par with a current gen Palm OS-based Treo, but that's very much a matter of personal taste. What
isn't as subjective, though, is the pure goodness of the E62's KHTML-based browser -- when you're not getting out of memory errors, anyway. It suffers the occasional rendering hiccup, but the way the mouse pointer is controlled via the thumb stick combined with the inline page thumbnail is simply brilliant.

As hot as the E62 is at first glance, regardless of the fact that it comes with all manner of Office-compatible editors, Outlook compatibility, and a decent email client, it's still a tough stretch to think that the average Treo or BlackBerry user is going to make the leap of faith. After all, why would the average business user want to throw away everything they've learned about Windows Mobile or Palm OS to switch to a different operating system that might (or might not) work marginally better for them? Instead, we see the E62 appealing to two groups: 1) Symbian devotees who dig the benefits (low price, good support) of having the phone be officially offered through Cingular, and 2) a new generation of mobile warriors attracted to the E62's design when the lay eyes on it in the store. Ultimately, it's the second group that's going to make or break Nokia's renewed push for American acceptance of S60 in the long term -- we've got our fingers crossed.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
tim @ Oct 29th 2006 2:34PM
Do those keys light up?
Scott Johnson @ Oct 29th 2006 3:18PM
It looks like a really nice form factor, but with Blackberry and WM5 phones already out there, I honestly don't understand why anyone would want an S60 phone these days.
rospaya @ Oct 29th 2006 4:39PM
@ Scott
Why not? S60 has everything and more than BB or WM, and great multitasking on a phone that i ever saw. I'm not a fanboy, but only curious why some think so low about S60 and Symbian?
Mark @ Oct 29th 2006 5:21PM
I have had the E62 since it was released and it is a great phone. The keyboard is very clear in the night and it has the best browser I have ever used. I wush it has WiFi, but I really dont mind because I am in NYC and get good EGDE speeds.
Matt @ Oct 29th 2006 5:51PM
Scott,
I sign my name under rospaya's posting.. WHY do you think so low of Symbian? It's been on the market for MUCH longer than WM or Blackberry (btw I don't get Blackberry's superiority over other devices in the Push e-mail area). I've tried WM before and to be honest it's a BITCH to set up. Symbian seems much more user friendly plus you don't get the Microsoft monopoly feeling in your hand. I've been an avid user of Symbian S60 since Nokia 3650 (before it was even available officially in the US) and I have to say that at that time I was using PocketPC (iPaq)..not a phone but eventually that evolved into WM for smartphone and I do have to say that I don't miss a single day after i ditched it in lieu of S60 phone.
Matt
Kent Pribbernow @ Oct 29th 2006 6:25PM
>..."plus you don't get the Microsoft monopoly feeling in your hand."
Just curious; what does a mobile monopoly feel like? I have the unique perspective of owning a Nokia E561, Treo 650, and Windows Mobile 5 device. And from personal experience I can say that which solution is "superior" depends entirely on the user. For mainstream consumers, the E61/62 is a credible choice. However, for someone migrating from a PalmOS or WM device, Symbian leaves a lot to be desired. First there is the lack of a touchscreen, which may or may not mean something to you depending on your familiarity with mobile devices. But the truly crippling aspect to S60 is the fragmented software experience. Any application written for S60 does not guarantee compatibility with the E60 series. I have encountered this issue numerous times since "upgrading" to the E61. You can read more about my experiences here.
Suffice to say, the E61 may offer the best mobile web brower on the the market, as well as a good overall hardware design, but the OS and lack of the vast third party software library enjoyed by PalmOS and Windows Mobile makes S60, and subsequently the E61/62, one step forward three steps back.
In the end, it comes down to YOU the end user. One mans trash is another man's treasure...and vice vera. My advice, to anyone, is to go to your nearest Cingular store and try out the device for yourself before making a final decision. The E61/62 is by far one of the best smartphones on the market right now. But neither it nor the software it runs on is for everyone. As in life itself, there are no easy anwers.
Kent Pribbernow @ Oct 29th 2006 6:29PM
Err..well the HTML code apparently doesn't work. The link is here...
http://www.pocketfactory.com/2006/10/01/moving-back-to-treo/
As I said, anyone contemplating the move from PalmOS/Windows Mobile to Symbian really needs to do their homework or at least experience the E62 for themselves before making a final decision.
Rich @ Oct 29th 2006 8:42PM
"..OS and lack of the vast third party software library enjoyed by PalmOS and Windows Mobile makes S60, and subsequently the E61/62, one step forward three steps back."
Hmm, funny but when I go to handango, which I think is a prety well known handheld software store I do find palm has the most software, its also ben around forever, however..if I do click on a motorola Q (Windows Mobile 5.0) I get a paltry 190 choices..and if I put in the E62 (S60 v3) I get a slightly more respectable 355, so I am confused at your statement.. also just OS wise Windows Smartphone has a total sw catalog (at handango) that is one -third the size of Symbian. Please keep your FUD to a dull roar.
Kent Pribbernow @ Oct 29th 2006 9:41PM
Hmm..last time I checked there were TWO variations of Windows Mobile, not just Smartphone edition. Did Pocket PC suddenly drop off the face of the earth?
Your point about PalmOS having "been around forever" is mute considering Symbian has been around nearly as long, which either way is a lame excuse to conceal the fragmented nature of Symbian.
Applications are only one part of the story. Try downloading themes for your E62. Not every theme designed for "S60" works with your device, or S6 3rd. Edition. This is the Achilles heal of Symbian; not only does application compatibility suffer from one version to another, but also in certain cases from one model to another. Which is crazy. At least when you download an application for PalmOS or WM, you have the assurance said application is compatible with your system. With Symbian it's a crapshoot.
That's not FUD...it's reality. You're talking to someone who owns an E61. I have owned this device since July. If you're going to tell me that everything I have experienced has been an illusion, I am all ears.
..........? @ Oct 30th 2006 2:19AM
who cares which smart phone platform is better. The most important thing is that you get something that you need and you know how to use it. ALWAYS GO TO THE STORE AND TRY OUT THE PHONE AND SEE IT YOU LIKE IT, GET IT IF YOU LIKE IT AND VICR VERSA
Big D @ Oct 30th 2006 9:57AM
I've had an E62 for several days. I have a relatively sizeable number of contacts in my desktop's Outlook (around 3700) and calendared items (around 600 or so). I found the E62 to be painfully slow compared to my Cingular 8700g B'berry. In fact, the terrific guy at my local Cingular store warned me of the potential for sluggist performance. I don't think I'm sold on the E62.
Robin @ Oct 30th 2006 10:52AM
Your comments: I originally had the E61 and used it on Cingular, but recently
switched to the E70 (US version) because I found the E61 reception to
be less than optimal. For whatever reason, the E70 is superior in the
latter respect, has wifi, has a camera, and has all the other things
the E61 and E62 otherwise have. I don't know if my experience with
the E61 had anything to do with the fact that my unit was imported -
but I doubt it. In any case, if you can deal with the different form
factor, I'd skip the E61/62 (even though the E61 felt more solidly
built - that was the first thing I noticed when I got the E70:
lighter and less solid). The performance on the E70 (if performance
is what you actually care about) is far superior though, in my
experience.
With respect to the OS discussions...For what it's worth,
I agree that it's a user-preference issue. That said, I gave up on my
Treo because I was so sick of having to reset Palm - something I
literally have never had to do with Symbian (going back to Psion
days). My workplace has everyone on Windows devices and the level of
frustration is high there as well. It seems people with engineering
degrees like those best. But again, it all comes down to what you
like and the amount of time you have in the course of your day to fiddle around with your device.
WP @ Oct 30th 2006 12:44PM
I had the E62 for about a week before returning it. I'm now back to using a BB 8700. It comes down to speed. It's the major complaint I've had about the Treos, too. When you're on the go, every keystroke and every second you have to look down at a screen is time wasted. People don't believe me, but the BB just "gets it." Email opens fast, is sent fast, and fields are populated quickly and accurately. Plus there's customizable quick-text that saves tons of time when you're typing common words. All of these thing are missing in the Symbian and Palm phones.
Just try this experiment:
Hold a BB 8700 in one hand and an E62 in the other.
Open an email you've received in each.
Notice how long it takes either phone to open the msg.
The lag time is even worse when you're composing an email.
T-Will @ Oct 30th 2006 5:16PM
I agree, who cares which OS it runs...from the screenshots it looks like a good looking OS (have no idea about the functionality though).
I'm just wondering, have you guys actually opened your eyes and looked at that hideous monstrosity pictured above???!!! It's just so...so square, plus it looks like a toy to me (maybe it looks better in real life).
I guess one man's trash really is another man's treasure. ;-)
tkmeister @ Oct 30th 2006 8:02PM
I got an E61 and have been using it for a week. So far, I love this device. It's nice to have wifi so i can make cheap international calls on VoIP over WLAN. Also, since i frequent to Japan, their WCDMA2100 frequency comes really handy for me. it's hard to find a phone that packs all the features and be reasonably priced.
I love the design of it. It's simple and very well made and definitely feels solid in my hands with the aluminium casing on the back.
E62 looks like a great deal for those who are using only domestic and no wifi needs.
Alex @ Oct 30th 2006 8:31PM
The engadget guys are right about the fact that anyone who has used Palm or PPC/Win Mobile for a long time probably doesn't have much incentive to switch over. And this is true even after you tell them all that is great about Symbian/Series60 phones or that your phone should never ever run Windows or that Palm is an outdated OS (by the way I used to use palms religiously, until I switched to my first Symbian/Series60 device--Nokia 6600), while Symbian Series60 was essentially written for cell phones.
Symbian OS has undergone a substantial OS upgrade with the 3rd Edition/9.x Symbian, just like when Windows went from 3.1, to 95, to XP, or when Mac OS went from OS9 to OS X--certain software won't work. Not to mention that Windows devices, at least used to have, the same problem when they had various processors, and isn't it still true of Win Mobile 5.0 devices vs. PocketPC devices.
The programs you get for E61/62 and all other S60 devices are clearly identified as those designed or not to work with 3rd Edition of the OS (or they say which models are supported). Same with themes, because never devices have higher res screens, make sure you download a theme that is meant for your device (almost always identified as Symbian 9.1), period.
Having said all that. I spent considerable time with E61 (not mine) and currently own a Nokia N73. The phones are phone first, PDA second-- although the E61 blurs that line substantially, and I agree 100% with everything the engadget guys say about this device. They sync out of the box with Mac OSX and Windows and do it very well. They come loaded with Word, Excel, PPT, and PDF readers; as well as the best web browser of any phone/pda device, perfectly decent email programs, calendar/todo, contacts, Voice activations/dialing, BlueTooth/IR/Cable Connections. They also works as wireless modems for tethering your laptop.
And then you start getting [this depends on which Eseries or Nseries Nokia you're looking at] into 2-3Megapixel cams, MP3 players, Sound recorders, FM Radio.
And of course it's a smart phone, so install whatever you want on top, Symbian or Java apps. Oh yeah, and S60 phones never crash!
Is the above enough to get people to switch? Probably not, because many won't believe what I wrote. And because they're too used to what they have. Too bad.
Juice @ Oct 31st 2006 11:49AM
Here's another good review
http://www.qwertybar.com/nokiae62
Baron @ Nov 1st 2006 12:38PM
I've owned the e61 and I can tell you without a doubt that it is brutally slow. Sure it works great for the first week or two, but then after you've populated it with contacts, filled up your browser cache with web pages and photos, and got 100+ text messages and emails stored, this thing slows down to a crawl. The call quality is great and the browser is the best, but the speed of the OS is a deal killer.
Larry @ Nov 2nd 2006 12:37AM
I'm a dedicated BB user. When I threw my 8700 around 1 too many times. I couldn't wait for the 8800 to show up on Cingular, so I tried the E62.
I like the screen, my vision sucks. I like that I can create groups in my phone list. I can't stand not having copy and paste, like BB. It can be hella slow waiting for applications to run, More RAM would be good. I love the bluetooth synching with my PC for Outlook. I like that I can see pictures, music and videos that my friends send me. I miss the scroll-wheel on the side, I love the joystick. Trying to type out a long message on the E62 can be a pain, it not a ergo as the 8700. I think the 8700 is a 4.5 out of 5. The E62 is a 4 out of 5. Or the E62 is the 7290 with a killer screen and Multimedia.
Knut @ Nov 2nd 2006 4:31AM
To everyone that experience a slow S60-OS: Try restarting the phone if it starts working slow!
mobilelawyer @ Nov 8th 2006 4:09PM
I am trying the e62, and really like it so far. I am not a Crackberry addict, but I have used a Treo 650 and the Cingular 8125. True the e62 can't do as much as the 8125, but it has two very strong points for me: qwerty keyboard that you don't have to slide out, and a truly excellent phone. It's lighter that the 8125, and my Exchange email lets pushed to the phone in seconds. Sure there is some delay, but there was delay in opening the mail application in the 8125 that often far exceeded the wait time with this device. Depends on what your needs are, and what you use the device for. Doesn't have WiFi, but I seldom used it with the 8125. May be a keeper.
roberto Pocaterra @ Nov 13th 2006 3:59PM
I can not sync my nokia e62 with my entourage in my MAC PowerPC G4. Does anyone knows how to do it?
ip @ Nov 18th 2006 12:32AM
I just wish it has wifi like the E61.
BARRY WAX @ Nov 25th 2006 4:53PM
Need some help. Does anyone know if the E62 has wi-fi capability embedded in the phone (like the E61), and, if so, can be enabled? And, if so, how.
Thanks.
BW
Sekhar @ Dec 14th 2006 2:10PM
I have all my contacts in an excel sheet, and is there a smart way to get them copied to my e62 address book?
Jim Caton @ Dec 29th 2006 1:07PM
I've never used a Symbian phone until I bought an E62. After using several MS/Palm based phones (600/650, Q, 700W, etc, etc) I was atracted to the E62 by its price. I wasn't disappointed; this phone rocks.
Its features are unmatched at its price point and its ergonomics are the best I've seen. It's a winner, and will only get better with the addition of WiFi and a good camera.