<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/08/19/i-mate-sheds-htc-for-pocket-pc-q-killer/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/08/19/i-mate-sheds-htc-for-pocket-pc-q-killer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/08/19/i-mate-sheds-htc-for-pocket-pc-q-killer/</guid><description><![CDATA["this just might turn out to be a decent contender from i-mate."<br><br>You havin a laugh... that thing is fugly.  You see devices such as the Q and the i320 which look more sexy than the excalibur.<br><br>The colour is awful, its big (even with the larger screen, they could of got it into a smaller form factor) the keys look awful, and the JAQ logo just looks cheap.  Can HTC and i-mate please take some design tips from Nokia, SE, Moto and Samsung please.<br><br>While HTC make excellent form factors.  The Breeze (block) and the Excalibur are just REALLY fugly.  More designs like the Hermes and the Orange C600.<br><br>This looks like a load of JAQ SHI...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Liam Billington]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2006 4:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/08/19/i-mate-sheds-htc-for-pocket-pc-q-killer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/08/19/i-mate-sheds-htc-for-pocket-pc-q-killer/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is the "Mercury" smartphone device developed by Inventec earlier this year. You can find out more here...<br><br><a href="http://msmobiles.com/news.php/4890.html" rel="nofollow">http://msmobiles.com/news.php/4890.html</a><br><br>Here's a pic...<br><br><a href="http://x.msmobiles.com/portal/images/palm/mercury.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://x.msmobiles.com/portal/images/palm/mercury.jpg</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kent Pribbernow]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2006 4:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/08/19/i-mate-sheds-htc-for-pocket-pc-q-killer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/08/19/i-mate-sheds-htc-for-pocket-pc-q-killer/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've seen this before. The UTStarcom-branded version is called the PPC4200. They showed it off at 3GSM back in February. It was thoroughly underwhelming, though... by far the cheapest-feeling Windows Mobile device I've ever tried.<br><br>I know UTStarcom doesn't manufacture it though, so Kent may be right about it being designed by Inventec.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rich Brome]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 19th 2006 5:20PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/08/19/i-mate-sheds-htc-for-pocket-pc-q-killer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/08/19/i-mate-sheds-htc-for-pocket-pc-q-killer/</guid><description><![CDATA[A design from a company other that HTC is welcome. A little competition will be good. Its been long enough since 3GSM that the build quality may have improved.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Orneta Mobile]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 20th 2006 2:41AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>