even if an "iphone" ever did come into existence, i wouldn't even consider it unless it had a wm5 killer os. if it did, then i could justify buying it ('cause you know apple's gonna jack up the price tag on that sucker).
"add this to the even more speculation about the possibility of incorporating the Intel Core 2 duo's into the new Macs"
uh, that's not speculation; apple's been planning for a while to use intel's amd 4x4 killer. here's a thought, which marketing strategy is more effective: 1. leaking proto shots and data about a phone to hype the unknown release of it, or 2. running the rumor mill into the ground WAY before you even plan on doing anything, and hyping up the product by being wiley and vague about any details given (if any at all) while still promising you're doing something?
or, in real life, which has generated more buzz, the gsm treo release, or the iphone (speculative) release?
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
-_- @ Jul 29th 2006 7:04PM
congrats on getting first post, tim (lucky).
even if an "iphone" ever did come into existence, i wouldn't even consider it unless it had a wm5 killer os. if it did, then i could justify buying it ('cause you know apple's gonna jack up the price tag on that sucker).
"add this to the even more speculation about the possibility of incorporating the Intel Core 2 duo's into the new Macs"
uh, that's not speculation; apple's been planning for a while to use intel's amd 4x4 killer.
here's a thought, which marketing strategy is more effective:
1. leaking proto shots and data about a phone to hype the unknown release of it, or
2. running the rumor mill into the ground WAY before you even plan on doing anything, and hyping up the product by being wiley and vague about any details given (if any at all) while still promising you're doing something?
or, in real life, which has generated more buzz, the gsm treo release, or the iphone (speculative) release?