<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for SLVR L7c rumored for Sprint</title>
<link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/06/01/slvr-l7c-rumored-for-sprint/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for SLVR L7c rumored for Sprint</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SLVR L7c rumored for Sprint]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/06/01/slvr-l7c-rumored-for-sprint/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/06/01/slvr-l7c-rumored-for-sprint/</guid><description><![CDATA[Finally, a little variety comes to Sprint, but I wont hold my breath for this phone. Hopefully handsets will start becoming a little more exciting here in the US.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Oakland510]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2006 12:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SLVR L7c rumored for Sprint]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/06/01/slvr-l7c-rumored-for-sprint/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/06/01/slvr-l7c-rumored-for-sprint/</guid><description><![CDATA[what is the capacity of the SLVR's battery?  I have a feeling that CDMA + small, thin battery = real crappy Blade-esque battery life. . . ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2006 1:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SLVR L7c rumored for Sprint]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/06/01/slvr-l7c-rumored-for-sprint/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/06/01/slvr-l7c-rumored-for-sprint/</guid><description><![CDATA[Does this mean no SLVR for verizon now? Crap..]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[killiansdlight]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2006 4:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SLVR L7c rumored for Sprint]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/06/01/slvr-l7c-rumored-for-sprint/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/06/01/slvr-l7c-rumored-for-sprint/</guid><description><![CDATA[[start dumb useless rant]<br>Pffft.. I waited forever & a day for Sprint to come out with something that supported iSync.  'had the T608 for the longest time - 'finally caved & got the Samsung A900 (which *still* doesn't support syncing) - and really can't afford a 700P.<br>Who am I kidding - consumers really don't care about bluetooth anyway, right?<br>Ah well - with Sprint's track record, this probably will actually come out when my contract is up.<br>[/end dumb useless rant]]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[djTA630]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 1st 2006 7:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SLVR L7c rumored for Sprint]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/06/01/slvr-l7c-rumored-for-sprint/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/06/01/slvr-l7c-rumored-for-sprint/</guid><description><![CDATA[Didn't pcsintel "scoop" the RAZR V3m was coming to Sprint?  Yeah, they did.  Take this "scoop" with the same grain of salt.  <br><br>Hey Sprint, it's time to lend Sanyo some cash so they can INNOVATE again, not IMITATE.  It's almost criminal the direction that Sanyo has gone the past two or three years.  Remember, they had the first integrated camera phone in the US.  They had the ORIGINAL slim candy bar phone over four years ago.  Now they are just playing catchup as far as design and features.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[flamer's grill]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 2nd 2006 4:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SLVR L7c rumored for Sprint]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/06/01/slvr-l7c-rumored-for-sprint/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/06/01/slvr-l7c-rumored-for-sprint/</guid><description><![CDATA[FINALLY SPRINT PHONES ARE TEH SUK!!!111!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 2nd 2006 6:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SLVR L7c rumored for Sprint]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/06/01/slvr-l7c-rumored-for-sprint/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/06/01/slvr-l7c-rumored-for-sprint/</guid><description><![CDATA[The only thing I would be really interested in is if this moto has EVDO... With the bluetooth use as modem hack I love my A920, but it wouldn't be such a bad thing to deal with to slap an extended battery on this slim little dealy, especially since I got the extendo for the A920... If it does all that and the bag of chips I might be willing to buy it early...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 2nd 2006 7:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SLVR L7c rumored for Sprint]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/06/01/slvr-l7c-rumored-for-sprint/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/06/01/slvr-l7c-rumored-for-sprint/</guid><description><![CDATA[I read on this site that the SLVR was coming to Verizon. Is this still correct or is Sprint the only CDMA carrier getting it?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DF]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2006 5:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on SLVR L7c rumored for Sprint]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/06/01/slvr-l7c-rumored-for-sprint/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/06/01/slvr-l7c-rumored-for-sprint/</guid><description><![CDATA[As a long time Sprint Customer AND Corp. owned Retail Store Rep, all I can say is...About damn time we get better phones!!! I just hope it will have EVDO and a fair price.   ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GeeOhh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 5th 2006 6:11AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>