Global environmental responsibility is not the objective of Samsung and most companies. Just think, another device that emits not only electromagnetic radiation linked to brain and testicular tumors but now we can have a compound of chemicals to synergize with the effect of electromagnetic radiation and induce tumors with far more efficacy. I had one friend working in a fuel injection repair business who wore a cell phone on his hip for ten years of his working life. He died from testicular tumors. From the time of diagnosis to death was less than six weeks.
The winners I see in this equation are: the manufacturing, medical, and pharmaceutical industries. And this is at the cost to taxpayers, governments, and the health and safety of the public.
How will companies sustain their market? Easily, they will "evergreen" their patent with 'new' complex chemical compounds called "fragrance" so everyone will continue to think it couldn't possibly be my phone that caused my disease. And it will all be protected by "Trade Secrets" so only specialist doctors can access the data on the health and safety of such products.
If Ancient Egypt was eradicated due to lead-lined aqueducts then maybe this generation of greed and human rights abuse can be eradicated from the face of the planet.
Samsungs reputation for reliability is less than perfect so adding solvents to the mix only makes their products more vulnerable for the customers who buy their products. What happens when you wear a solvent enriched phone that develops a fault and ignites? You get a hot phone stinking of burnt plastic that doesn’t work and third degree burns. Notice how the last result is your health.
As the advertising hook on the public is "You deserve this product" then you are just as gullible as the person feeding a one armed bandit at a casino. Wake up world, you’re addicted to solvents that produce your addictive narcotic state of mind and that makes you vulnerable to further tactics of the media to seduce you into consumerism.
According to various departments of epidemiology, between 16-25% of the civilized world report being adversely affected by chemical exposure. Between 0.9-6.3% are diagnosed with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity. http://au.geocities.com/jonno6766/mcs.pdf
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Jonathan Wilson @ Mar 27th 2007 9:20AM
Global environmental responsibility is not the objective of Samsung and most companies. Just think, another device that emits not only electromagnetic radiation linked to brain and testicular tumors but now we can have a compound of chemicals to synergize with the effect of electromagnetic radiation and induce tumors with far more efficacy. I had one friend working in a fuel injection repair business who wore a cell phone on his hip for ten years of his working life. He died from testicular tumors. From the time of diagnosis to death was less than six weeks.
The winners I see in this equation are: the manufacturing, medical, and pharmaceutical industries. And this is at the cost to taxpayers, governments, and the health and safety of the public.
How will companies sustain their market? Easily, they will "evergreen" their patent with 'new' complex chemical compounds called "fragrance" so everyone will continue to think it couldn't possibly be my phone that caused my disease. And it will all be protected by "Trade Secrets" so only specialist doctors can access the data on the health and safety of such products.
If Ancient Egypt was eradicated due to lead-lined aqueducts then maybe this generation of greed and human rights abuse can be eradicated from the face of the planet.
Samsungs reputation for reliability is less than perfect so adding solvents to the mix only makes their products more vulnerable for the customers who buy their products. What happens when you wear a solvent enriched phone that develops a fault and ignites? You get a hot phone stinking of burnt plastic that doesn’t work and third degree burns. Notice how the last result is your health.
As the advertising hook on the public is "You deserve this product" then you are just as gullible as the person feeding a one armed bandit at a casino. Wake up world, you’re addicted to solvents that produce your addictive narcotic state of mind and that makes you vulnerable to further tactics of the media to seduce you into consumerism.
According to various departments of epidemiology, between 16-25% of the civilized world report being adversely affected by chemical exposure. Between 0.9-6.3% are diagnosed with Multiple Chemical Sensitivity.
http://au.geocities.com/jonno6766/mcs.pdf