<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Steve Ballmer predicts $100 smartphones in 1-2 years</title>
<link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/02/15/steve-ballmer-predicts-100-smartphones-in-1-2-years/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Steve Ballmer predicts $100 smartphones in 1-2 years</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Steve Ballmer predicts $100 smartphones in 1-2 years]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/02/15/steve-ballmer-predicts-100-smartphones-in-1-2-years/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/02/15/steve-ballmer-predicts-100-smartphones-in-1-2-years/</guid><description><![CDATA[Microsoft has certainly got a real fight on its hands here.<br><br>Whilst their current smartphones appeal to enterprise and techno-junkies, I think they will have a hard time selling their devices to the average consumer.<br><br>The main problem, as I see it, is that most of their devices are designed and built by HTC. HTC have zero brand recognition and most consumers will stick to brands they know. With the success of the RAZR, it's obvious that industrial design is a top priority for consumers, but this is also HTC's biggest weakness. The build quality of their devices is also questionable. The SMT5600 was notorious for its problems and apparently the newer Cingular 2125 is also seeing  similar issues. To put it simply, HTC are unlikely to ever hit mass market.<br><br>So that leaves Microsoft looking at other manufacturers to provide them with that leap into the mainstream. Motorola have proven to have a very poor track record when it comes to Windows smartphones and are increasingly throwing their weight behind Linux. Samsung are producing a few Windows smartphones, but again, are exploring other smartphone platforms and could jump ship. And then we have Nokia and Sony Ericsson exclusively releasing Symbian handsets. None of the big manufacturers are really getting behind Microsoft at this point.<br><br>So, I don't see where the volume sales are going to come from.<br><br>I'm sure Microsoft will play their usual game - plug away, invest huge sums of money, slowly improve their product and wait for the opposition to slip up. It's a strategy that's worked for them many times in the past.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xbit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2006 7:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Steve Ballmer predicts $100 smartphones in 1-2 years]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/02/15/steve-ballmer-predicts-100-smartphones-in-1-2-years/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/02/15/steve-ballmer-predicts-100-smartphones-in-1-2-years/</guid><description><![CDATA[$100 smartphones would usher in a whole new era of R&D for mlearning! Now if only PDA-hybrids didn't cost an arm and a leg.<br><br>Affordable mobile learning, that's certainly something to chew on.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kiran]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2006 7:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Steve Ballmer predicts $100 smartphones in 1-2 years]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/02/15/steve-ballmer-predicts-100-smartphones-in-1-2-years/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/02/15/steve-ballmer-predicts-100-smartphones-in-1-2-years/</guid><description><![CDATA[1. M$ mobile and handheld computing solutions have never been the best available but,<br><br>2. that really doesn't matter because,<br><br>3. M$ have enough money to pay manufacturers to MAKE phones with their OS and GIVE them to the carriers which would pretty much sink SYMBIAN and LINUX]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2006 9:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Steve Ballmer predicts $100 smartphones in 1-2 years]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/02/15/steve-ballmer-predicts-100-smartphones-in-1-2-years/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/02/15/steve-ballmer-predicts-100-smartphones-in-1-2-years/</guid><description><![CDATA[Of the $100, approximately $100 will go to Microsoft for windows license ;)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2006 9:45AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Steve Ballmer predicts $100 smartphones in 1-2 years]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/02/15/steve-ballmer-predicts-100-smartphones-in-1-2-years/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/02/15/steve-ballmer-predicts-100-smartphones-in-1-2-years/</guid><description><![CDATA[Finally! It has taken the industry this long to realize that consumers want less expensive smartphones. Heck better software in current cellphones would be a big improvement. I know that the normal cameraphones they hawk these days are more than capable of handling user data better and being able to synch with a computer database of names/addresses/numbers.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2006 9:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Steve Ballmer predicts $100 smartphones in 1-2 years]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/02/15/steve-ballmer-predicts-100-smartphones-in-1-2-years/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/02/15/steve-ballmer-predicts-100-smartphones-in-1-2-years/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think once the phones become affordable people will switch in droves.  What consumer wouldn't pick a phone that has the same interface as their computer at home and at work?  That has the same contacts?  A phone they can use out of the box without reading the manual?<br><br>I think only price has kept them out of the average joe's hands.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Slocko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2006 9:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Steve Ballmer predicts $100 smartphones in 1-2 years]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/02/15/steve-ballmer-predicts-100-smartphones-in-1-2-years/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/02/15/steve-ballmer-predicts-100-smartphones-in-1-2-years/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah.  We'll see $100.00 Smartphones.  Sure.  That's after the rebate the carrier gives you after ensnaring you with a two year contract!  Or was Balmer talking about a $100.00 price with no contract requirement?  Those are two different prices people.  I mean, you can get an SMT5600 with Cingular for under $100.00 now but you have to sign up for two years with them and if you already have a contract with them then tough luck.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[apeguero]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2006 12:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Steve Ballmer predicts $100 smartphones in 1-2 years]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/02/15/steve-ballmer-predicts-100-smartphones-in-1-2-years/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/02/15/steve-ballmer-predicts-100-smartphones-in-1-2-years/</guid><description><![CDATA[Re: "What consumer wouldn't pick a phone that has the same interface as their computer at home and at work?"<br><br>Is it possible that the reason nobody carries a Windows smartphone isn't because they're expensive, but because nobody wants to carry a heavily branded, awkward micro-Windows PC in their pocket?<br><br>Does anyone really like the Windows interface?  Is it really the best fit for a mobile device?<br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[R. Emory Lundberg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2006 1:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Steve Ballmer predicts $100 smartphones in 1-2 years]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/02/15/steve-ballmer-predicts-100-smartphones-in-1-2-years/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/02/15/steve-ballmer-predicts-100-smartphones-in-1-2-years/</guid><description><![CDATA[Heck, $100 smartphone with perfiferals like keyboard (and probably some kind of cranking mechanism to charge it) may pose a serious threat to those MIT $100 laptops. And when fuel cell will become viable, they'll run on vodka too:) This will be a good way for Mr. Gates to get back at people who preferred Linux over Windows for the $100 lappies. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[otaman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2006 1:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Steve Ballmer predicts $100 smartphones in 1-2 years]]></title><link>http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/02/15/steve-ballmer-predicts-100-smartphones-in-1-2-years/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/02/15/steve-ballmer-predicts-100-smartphones-in-1-2-years/</guid><description><![CDATA[Doesn't sound far-fetched IMHO. You can now get entry-level Nokia phones for under 50 euros.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mobile Phone News]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2006 9:47AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>